Search for: "Deal v. Deal"
Results 3461 - 3480
of 38,475
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2019, 4:05 am
The Appellate Division gave explicit advice, not often heard, on how to deal with an Order to Show Cause which a judge declines to sign. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 3:41 pm
Specifically, it deals with the question of whether a tenancy deposit taken prior to the introduction of the tenancy deposit protection schema should be placed into protection on the renewal of a tenancy. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 10:27 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 1:56 pm
One of these cases, Sardana v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 9:27 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Young v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 11:06 am
In its July 12, 2012 decision in Biagiotti v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 7:08 am
In Klier v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 12:50 pm
In today’s case (Barta v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 5:18 am
Certifying the preferred list to fill a vacancy Castle v Putnam-Westchester BOCES, 269 AD2d 394Section 3013 of the Education Law deals with layoff upon the abolishment of a position by a school district or a BOCES.The statute provides, in pertinent part, for the reinstatement of a person who has been laid off “to an office or position similar to the one, which such person filled without reduction in salary or increment.... [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 5:01 am
Recently, in Carlebach v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 2:56 am
Perhaps in recognition that iiNet (and pretty much any other ISP) will be in big trouble if they sit on their hands when the next letter of demand comes in from AFACT notice comes in, Meanwhile on 11 March, the Internet Industries Association has announced that it is “fastracking” development of an industry code to deal with copyright infringement. [read post]
10 May 2012, 12:07 pm
In this week’s case, Van Hartevelt v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 7:48 am
In this week’s case (Van Hartevelt v. [read post]
30 Mar 2008, 3:00 am
Below are three interesting and useful blog posts and websites dealing with copyright issues. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 10:49 am
It turns out that a 1992 US Supreme Court Case, Quill Corp. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 6:18 am
In McCoy v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 5:00 am
In Henderson v. [read post]
Australian Federal Court Backs India on Sovereign Immunity: Another Twist in the Devas v. India Saga
3 Apr 2025, 4:32 am
In deciding whether India has waived its immunity, the Primary judge invoked the judgement of the High Court of Australia (“High Court) in Kingdom of Spain v Infrastructure Services (“Spain v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 2:24 pm
Plus, it's not a pro per case.Still, I couldn't help but feel a vibe that this is the kind of neat-dealing that one might see from an attorney trying to negotiate a good deal. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 2:13 am
Jones v Kernott [2011] UKSC 53; [2011] WLR (D) 321 “When a cohabiting couple bought a family home in their joint names and were both responsible for the mortgage, but without any express declaration as to their beneficial interests, the starting point was that equity followed the law so that the presumption was that they were joint tenants both in law and in equity. [read post]
