Search for: "Does 1-39" Results 3461 - 3480 of 5,129
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2011, 4:34 pm by Eric Schweibenz
  Specifically, the Commission determined to review:  (1) the ALJ’s construction of the claim term “oven;” (2) the ALJ’s construction of the claim term “sawing;” (3) the ALJ’s determination that the accused process does not infringe, either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, claims 12, 15, 31-32, 34-35, and 38-39 of the ‘614 patent or claim 1 of the ‘942 patent; (4) the ALJ’s… [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm by The Legal Blog
Justice KG BalakrishnanThe Supreme Court in Selvi & Ors. v State of Karnataka has examined the law relating to the involuntary administration of certain scientific techniques, namely narcoanalysis, polygraph examination and the Brain Electrical Activation Profile (BEAP) test for the purpose of improving investigation efforts in criminal cases. [read post]
13 May 2011, 7:56 pm by annalthouse@gmail.com (Ann Althouse)
I've been a reader here (on the main blog) for some years now, and how does "Large blogs with multiple, unfocused / unrelated subjects. [read post]
11 May 2011, 9:10 am by PJ Blount
If this Act does not receive the vote necessary for immediate effect, this Act takes effect September 1, 2011. ______________________________ ______________________________ President of the Senate Speaker of the House I hereby certify that S.B. [read post]
10 May 2011, 1:28 pm by PJ Blount
Paragraph (a) does not prevent or limit the liability 41 of a spaceflight entity if the spaceflight entity does any one 42 or more of the following: 43 1.? [read post]
9 May 2011, 4:13 pm
The General Court failed to recognise that the public does not necessarily perceive different categories of signs in the same way. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:09 pm by James McComish
Australian law does not countenance ownership of a person. [read post]
8 May 2011, 3:25 pm by NL
In effect, they sought to defend the appeal by arguing that Lambeth had been and remained in continuous breach of its duty under s.39(5)(aa). [read post]
8 May 2011, 3:25 pm by NL
In effect, they sought to defend the appeal by arguing that Lambeth had been and remained in continuous breach of its duty under s.39(5)(aa). [read post]
3 May 2011, 9:16 am by WSLL
Additionally, the collection of sales taxes on these vehicles does not violate the U.S. [read post]