Search for: "Grant v. Superior Court" Results 3461 - 3480 of 6,581
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2007, 10:51 am
Jury questions thus remaining, the trial court's grant of summary judgment for Modern Continental was error. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 12:02 pm by Gail Heriot
MCRI was passed in the wake of the Supreme Court’s 2003 decision in Grutter v. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 4:15 am by Gideon
Under this act, the judges of the Superior Court annually appointed a member of the bar who had practiced at least five years to represent persons accused of crime. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 3:31 am
The Appeals Court sent the case back to Hampden Superior Court for the hearing. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 11:51 am by Naomi Jane Gray
Breaking: This morning, Judge Pauley of the Southern District of New York issued an opinion granting in part and denying in part (but mostly denying) the defendant’s motion for judgment as a matter of law in Capitol Records v MP3Tunes, in which the jury had found liability for copyright infringement and awarded over $48 million in damages. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 11:51 am by Naomi Jane Gray
Breaking: This morning, Judge Paule of the Southern District of New York issued an opinion granting in part and denying in part the defendant’s motion for judgment as a matter of law in Capitol Records v MP3Tunes, in which the jury had found liability for copyright infringement and awarded over $48 million in damages. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 4:40 pm by Chris Jaglowitz
For the impact on condo litigation, see our April 5, 2015 blog post entitled Superior housekeeping at Superior Court. #8 – Kamal v. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 4:40 pm by Chris Jaglowitz
For the impact on condo litigation, see our April 5, 2015 blog post entitled Superior housekeeping at Superior Court. #8 – Kamal v. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 4:40 pm by Chris Jaglowitz
For the impact on condo litigation, see our April 5, 2015 blog post entitled Superior housekeeping at Superior Court. #8 – Kamal v. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 6:52 pm
The plaintiff cites but one Connecticut decision--and research has failed to reveal any others--DeGolyer v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 6:41 am by Antonin I. Pribetic
Citing with approval the recent  judgment of the International Court of Justice (“ICJ”) in Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. [read post]
14 Nov 2006, 10:01 am
The trial court properly granted summary judgment in favor of Dr. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 6:19 am
’ It asserted that a protective order would be ineffective and unworkable and that the court could grant no effective relief short of quashing the subpoena.LMC supported its motion with a declaration from Petrushova. [read post]