Search for: "Harris v. Harris" Results 3461 - 3480 of 7,445
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2013, 8:07 am by WSLL
Justice Voigt respectfully dissented.Case Name: EDWARD VENARD v. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 10:24 am by Jordan Bublick
The issuance by the Third District Court of Appeals in Miami of the recent decision in Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, etc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 7:15 am by Larry
You may recall that in United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 10:24 am by Jordan Bublick
The issuance by the Floirda Third District Court of Appeals in Miami of the recent decision in Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, etc. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 6:48 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
Language scientists have made great strides in the past quarter-Century, but legal professionals are only now waking-up to the importance of this language tool.In People v Harris, Justices Zahra and Stephen Markman both used corpus linguistics in opposing opinions to address a legal question involving whether a police officer's false statement is nevertheless protected within the scope of a Michigan law that procribes a police officer’s involuntary statement from… [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
Harris, Director of the Franklin D. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 1:36 pm
For those of you looking to comment on the Pearson v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 8:42 am
DocName=070504050HArt%2E+V&ActID=1863&ChapterID=50&SeqStart=13300000&SeqEnd=25500000 [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 3:14 pm
More information is available on the Action Fraud web site.The ruling in question is Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks & Another v Intellectual Property Agency Ltd & Another [2015] EWHC 3256 (IPEC), a decision of the gentle, affable Judge Richard Hacon. [read post]
13 Nov 2016, 6:13 am by Brooke
LaShawn Harris speaks about her Sex Workers, Psychics, and Numbers Runners: Black Women in New York City's Underground Economy. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Adell, Razing the Forest to Kill a Tree: EEOC V. [read post]