Search for: "Head v. The University"
Results 3461 - 3480
of 3,691
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2008, 10:08 am
Supreme Court held in Jones v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 8:07 am
: (Spicy IP), Latin America: Merck Serono signs distribution agreement with Bristol-Myers Squibb for portfolio of established pharmaceutical brands in Latin America: (IP tango), US: Biotech industry growth to slow due to funding pressures and competition from biosimilars: (Managing Intellectual Property), US: House Commerce Committee posts responses to its questions on biogenerics; not surprisingly, the views run the gamut: (FDA Law Blog), US: Biosimilar debate heats up at BIO: (Managing… [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 1:15 pm
In 2001, the Supreme Court, in Zadvydas v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:40 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ECJ rules trade mark holders cannot stop honest comparative advertising: O2 Holdings Limited and O2 (UK) Limited v Hutchinson 3G UK Limited: (Out-Law), (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 10:31 pm
Talbert v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 3:28 am
For Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus (HGN), examiners had the benefit of equipment to stabilize the subject's head and a protractor for measuring the angle of onset of nystagmus. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 1:36 am
Healthport Corp. v. [read post]
23 May 2008, 3:15 am
Facing this steep hurdle, the plan was struck down.The court's approach was not inevitable, but a path in this direction was laid years earlier, when Marshall was on the Court.Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
23 May 2008, 1:03 am
– Brdo: (IPR-Helpdesk), 5-6 June: USFDA public meeting on evaluation of product trade names: (FDA Law Blog), 9-12 June: (US) Strategies for management of IP – Chicago: (IPR-Helpdesk), 11 June: MARQUES ‘First meeting with Spanish Judges of the Community Trade Mark Courts’ – Alicante: (Class 46), 16 June / 1 July: US PLI: ‘Prior art & obviousness 2008: The PTO and CAFC perspective on patent law sections 102 & 103’ -… [read post]
22 May 2008, 3:46 am
Case Name: Hendricks v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 8:38 am
Earlier coverage of Medellin v. [read post]
18 May 2008, 10:50 am
"See a list of ILB entries on the Court of Appeals decision in the case of Morrison v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 12:43 pm
Further on the characterization of this as an "activist" court, the Los Angeles Times reported today the views of Professor Gerald Uelmen of the University of Santa Clara Law School, who said he was "blown away" and "very surprised" by the decision. [read post]
15 May 2008, 3:10 am
Hall) became official yesterday, by vote of the university's regents. [read post]
9 May 2008, 10:30 pm
: (Afro-IP), (Managing Intellectual Property), Rwanda: Four years after AIDS drugs bill passed, first low cost meds may head to Rwanda: (GenericsWeb), US: Abbott’s first quarter lobbying tab hits $880,000: (Patent Docs), US: House Bill would expand federal drug pedigree requirements and preempt state requirements: (FDA Law Blog), US: Purchasing Canadian drugs and patent infringement: Litecubes decision: (Patently-O), US: Neuralstem seeks to reopen stayed patent… [read post]
9 May 2008, 2:27 pm
See also: http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2008/04/on-tafas-v-dudas-selected-excerpts.html [read post]
7 May 2008, 3:58 am
As written at Live Science by Ker Than in Sun Blamed for Warming of Earth and Other Worlds:"Benny Peiser, a social anthropologist at Liverpool John Moores University who monitors studies and news reports of asteroids, global warming and other potentially apocalyptic topics, recently quoted in his daily electronic newsletter the following from a blog called Strata-Sphere: "Global warming on Neptune's moon Triton as well as Jupiter and Pluto, and now Mars has some… [read post]
1 May 2008, 8:38 am
The precedent is United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 10:11 pm
Campbell (Faulkner University, Jones School of Law) has posted A 'Plausible' Showing after 'Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 6:32 pm
Both Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama have responded to today's Supreme Court ruling in Crawford v. [read post]
