Search for: "Held v. State"
Results 3461 - 3480
of 82,195
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2023, 2:12 am
In this post, Shabbir Bokhari, a paralegal in the Litigation & Arbitration team at CMS comments on the decision from the Supreme Court in R (AAA and Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 42 which was handed down on 15 November 2023. [read post]
1 Dec 2012, 9:08 am
The Court, concerned about the invasion of Defendant’s privacy, held that the three-part test from Martinelli v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:42 am
Moreover, most courts have held that school districts are not entitled to Eleventh Amendment immunity.2 11 In Mitchell v. [read post]
Case Preview: Protect Rural England (Kent) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
27 Jan 2021, 2:30 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department[4]. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 5:48 pm
See United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 8:45 am
North Carolina The Court held over Rogers County Board of Tax Roll Corrections v. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 5:41 am
Principles of federalism and comity, the Court held, require greater respect for state court rulings on constitutional errors in state trials. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 7:34 pm
Holder decision, which held that bone marrow donors could be legally compensated (for peripheral blood stem cells obtained through apheresis). [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 6:28 am
Texas held criminal “deviant intercourse” laws violated the 14th Amendment under rational basis review. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 11:43 am
Key Insight: Whether compelling the defendant to enter his cell phone password would violate his privilege against self incrimination under 5th Amendment and art. 12 of Mass Declaration of Rights Nature of Case: Trafficking a person for sexual servitude Electronic Data Involved: data held on cell phone Keywords: Cell phone password, 5th Amendment Identified State […] [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 12:52 pm
At the conclusion of the criminal investigation, the Office of the State’s ... [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 1:10 pm
A hearing was held on May 11, 2016, before an ... [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 2:14 am
US v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 6:50 am
John Buckley, et al. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 7:03 pm
See, Zoltek Corp. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 4:00 am
Petitioner filed an appeal pursuant to CPLR Article 78 challenging the District’s decision.The Appellate Division, sustaining the District’s action, noted that in addition to charges alleging excessive socializing and failure to complete assigned duties, Charge V, Specification 1, alleged that Petitioner stated that he "wanted to get a gun and go postal on this place. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 4:00 am
Petitioner filed an appeal pursuant to CPLR Article 78 challenging the District’s decision.The Appellate Division, sustaining the District’s action, noted that in addition to charges alleging excessive socializing and failure to complete assigned duties, Charge V, Specification 1, alleged that Petitioner stated that he "wanted to get a gun and go postal on this place. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 8:32 am
Id. at 483-84; see also State v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 9:13 am
On February 22, 2017, the Supreme Court decided Life Technologies Corp. v. [read post]
