Search for: "House v. Close" Results 3461 - 3480 of 7,516
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2016, 10:44 am by Chris Castle
We can infer that person did so probably with the blessing if not the instruction of the White House. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 12:19 pm by Eric Goldman
At some points, Provide’s ad copy included the phrase “edible arrangements,” but it later changed the ad copy to reference “edible fruit arrangements” as depicted in this screenshot from the opinion: Provide asserted that it always used its house brands in close proximity to the “edible fruit arrangements” phrase, but Edible provided examples where the house brand only appeared in the URL displayed in the ad copy. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 12:18 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
  While the trial court agreed that it was exempt, the appellate court reversed on the basis that the change undermined the city’s ability to meet its state share of housing needs when it relied upon the “anticipated densities” when developing its housing element. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 11:59 am
According to the State, Officer Gerald Carter saw Edwards's name on the luggage tag, opened the suitcase at the scene, viewed a pair of tennis shoes, closed the suitcase, and took it into custody. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 8:05 am by S
The sole exception appears to be where the applicant is close to dying and there is insufficient care available in the returning country to enable the applicant to die with dignity: N v Secretary of State for Home Department [2005] UKHL 31; [2005] 2 AC 296 and N v UK (2008) 47 EHRR 885. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 9:43 am by Ezra Rosser
Rogers (2011) – Kelly Terry Public Housing as Housing of Last Resort: Department of Housing and Urban Development v. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 7:55 pm
By 2008 U.S. courts deemed the area to be under de facto sovereignty of the United States (Boumediene v. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 5:30 am by Kevin
 Of cases I’ve mentioned here, the record is held by Ayers v. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 12:37 pm
 The statute says the house has to be "currently" inhabited. [read post]