Search for: "I v. B" Results 3461 - 3480 of 24,533
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2019, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
DSAR Adequacy Issue Under s.7 of the DPA 2018, a data subject whose personal data is being processed is entitled to a description of the personal data (s.7(b)(i)), the purposes for which they are processed (s.7(b)(ii)) and the recipients to whom they are or may be disclosed (s.7(b)(iii)). [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  I can’t call a product Ned Snow, but we’re fine with it—b/c common names require distinctiveness for TM rights. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 3:22 am by Dennis Crouch
This year we are doing a mock-appeal based upon Judge Huff’s decision in Natural Alternatives International, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 8:33 am by Kevin Johnson - Guest
  Judge Carlos Bea dissented from the majority’s holding with respect to Sections 2(B) and 6. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 9:55 pm
The § 102(b) exclusions, as Samuelson makes clear, have their origins in Baker v. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 8:10 am by Michael C. Dorf
[N.B. from Mike: Blogger inserts my name above because I'm hosting this guest post, but it was written by today's special guest contributor, Professor David B. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 2:07 pm by Alan S. Kaplinsky
  But I have never advocated that all consumer disputes should be resolved through arbitration. [read post]