Search for: "IN RE THE RULES OF CONTINUING LEGAL"
Results 3461 - 3480
of 15,740
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2009, 7:59 am
The plaintiffs could also simply choose to continue with their own individual trial. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 7:59 am
The plaintiffs could also simply choose to continue with their own individual trial. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 4:57 am
The plaintiff “was subsequently disbarred in New Jersey and suspended from the practice of law in New York for misappropriating the disputed portion of his legal fee” (Feng Li v Peng, 161 AD3d at 824; see Matter of Feng Li, 149 AD3d 238; In re Feng Li, 201 NJ 523, 65 A3d 254). [read post]
2 May 2016, 7:00 am
Latham filed a petition for re-hearing, which was denied on September 19, 2014, and then, on the court’s own motion, was granted on September 25, 2014. [read post]
22 Sep 2007, 4:48 pm
"The other disappointing decision, of course, was the legal one. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 12:30 am
Daimler and other automotive companies should make it a simple rule: if you represent SEP abusers and/or trolls, we're going to increasingly rely on other firms, as a matter of principle. [read post]
31 Dec 2018, 12:10 pm
Supreme Court ruled in Carpenter v. [read post]
4 Jan 2009, 4:02 pm
But if I'm wrong, then we will have a great victory for the Constitution-outside-the-courts crowd: A court ruling that Burris is eligible to serve, yet his continued exclusion. [read post]
6 May 2014, 8:40 am
The fight continues. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 7:56 am
Is Churning Legal? [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 6:41 pm
(In re Caviata Attached Homes, LLC) BAP No. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 6:41 pm
(In re Caviata Attached Homes, LLC) BAP No. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 10:38 pm
That would certainly force the companies to re-think and re-engineer how they manage the vast amount of data they collect. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 7:01 am
(And while we can certainly do legal analysis of them, we may not be as well-equipped as people in practice to figure out how the practicalities will develop.) [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 3:13 am
In re Highlights for Children, Inc., Serial No. 85838981 (March 23, 2016) [precedential]. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 11:18 am
Legal holidays are set forth and defined at Rule 6(a)(6). [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 7:44 am
Legal Karma Legal Karma accelerates law firm’s most important client interactions. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 9:47 pm
We're now only three weeks away from the Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 7:20 am
Fine, 867 P.2d 610, 618 (Wash. 1994) (once suit is filed "a patient . . . cannot insist on continued confidentiality from her physicians regarding the condition at issue based on the fiduciary nature of their relationship"); Vredeveld v. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 6:00 am
Once this deemed IDEL ends, regular layoff rules will recommence. [read post]
