Search for: "In Matter of Johnson*"
Results 3461 - 3480
of 6,855
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2014, 6:45 am
Circuit affirmed the district court’s ruling that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction to review the prisoners’ habeas actions. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 9:22 am
Cir. 1987) (“After the district court determines that a case is exceptional, there remains in every case its freedom to exercise its discretion informed by the court’s familiarity with the matter in the litigation and the interest of justice. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 7:21 am
” More troubling to Johnson than the factual discrepancy itself, though, was that the majority allowed a “post hoc justification” based on these unconnected facts, creating, in effect, “a ‘safe harbor’ for disparaging an employer’s products or services, no matter how far afield from the reality of the employer at issue, as long as the employees at some point afterwards come up with some tenuous connection to the employer or its general… [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 5:48 pm
If one judges the British press by the standards of the Fourth Estate – and, again, it’s a perfectly simple matter to adumbrate these (take a look at page 3 of David Randall’s wonderful book The Universal Journalist, for example) – much of what appears in the British press just isn’t journalism at all. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 2:45 pm
To make matters more complicated, the questions about when, how and to whom you attribute facts is a difficult one, especially in journalism. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 7:54 am
However, if there is no final agency action, a court generally lacks subject-matter jurisdiction over any such claim. [read post]
23 Aug 2014, 12:04 pm
Whether ISIS meets this standard as a factual matter is hardly clear. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 5:17 am
, 111 Ohio St.3d 177, 855 N.E.2d 825 (Ohio Supreme Court 2006), quoting Johnson v. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 4:48 am
He further sought maintenance and cure benefits from PPI under maritime law.PPI sought summary judgment dismissing his claims, asserting it was not Johnson's employer as a matter of law.U.S. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 10:38 am
“Falsity may be established by proving that (1) the advertising is literally false as a factual matter, or (2) although the advertisement is literally true, it is likely to deceive or confuse customers. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 10:30 am
“Falsity may be established by proving that (1) the advertising is literally false as a factual matter, or (2) although the advertisement is literally true, it is likely to deceive or confuse customers. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 10:04 am
I am handling the matter privately and, rest assured, I will definitely learn from my mistake. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 1:07 am
And does it matter? [read post]
16 Aug 2014, 3:47 am
We all have, and so will our children, no matter how angelic we are certain they are. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 7:16 am
Those extracts may possess the sufficient degree of originality for the sake of copyright protection, no matter whether they include the Premier League anthem, pre-recorded films, etc: they are their author's own intellectual creation. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 1:24 pm
Although the court thus agrees with the second of Defendant's constitutional claims, those issues have already been rejected by the First Department in the Ferrer matter as well as numerous prior appellate rulings. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 9:08 am
In a split decision, with a well reasoned dissent, on a matter of first impression, the Arizona Court of Appeals ruled that the foreign-state court decides the privilege issue under foreign-state law. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 9:08 am
In a split decision, with a well reasoned dissent, on a matter of first impression, the Arizona Court of Appeals ruled that the foreign-state court decides the privilege issue under foreign-state law. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 7:30 am
Noting that an employee’s subjective motive for taking action is not relevant to whether that action was “concerted,” or “for mutual aid or protection,” the majority stated that the proper focus is “whether there is a link between the activity and matters concerning the workplace or employees’ interests as employees. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 1:56 pm
And I’d of course love to hear what those who are familiar with the matter — not just the Schnall paper, but the broader replication controversy — have to say about it. [read post]
