Search for: "Little v State" Results 3461 - 3480 of 26,839
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2021, 3:21 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
A little over 65% of opinions rely on multiple subtests. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 12:52 pm by Alvaro Marañon, Benjamin Wittes
As Ellis describes, “[the hackers] have very little to lose by doing this—and potentially a big payday to gain. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  The diverging approaches of the majority and the dissenters in United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 3:27 pm
Supp. 2d 360, 367 (S.D.N.Y. 2012) (holding that “little past dealings” precludes a finding of acceptance  through  a  course  of conduct) with Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 1:01 pm by Bonnie Frost
It is a daunting expense as every year the cost of college goes up even though there has been little or no inflation or increase in wages for several years. [read post]
8 Aug 2021, 7:19 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The issue has garnered considerable public attention and more than a little local conflict. [read post]
8 Aug 2021, 9:07 am
Realities”; Denisse Delgado Vázquez, University of Massachusetts, Boston, “Cuban Newcomers: Their Economic Behavior and Political Motivations” [read post]
8 Aug 2021, 8:17 am by Eric Goldman
Longarzo * DMCA’s Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful State Law Claims–Stevens v. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 5:56 am by Tian Lu
 Seng v. the TMO On 20 February 2019, the TMO rejected the trade mark application (Decision [2019] No. 34784, ‘the TMO’s decision’) for violating Article 10.1(8) of the Trade Mark Law of China (TML, 2013 Amendment),* an absolute ground for refusal and invalidity that applies when a sign is ‘detrimental to socialist morality or mores or having any other adverse effect’. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 10:54 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Both of these issues were addressed by Washington State Supreme Court in Putman v. [read post]