Search for: "MATTER OF J M J"
Results 3461 - 3480
of 5,085
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2011, 7:01 am
(a) Exclusion Amount- (1) IN GENERAL- Subparagraph (A) of section 2010(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘$5,000,000’ and inserting ‘$1,000,000’. (2) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT- Subparagraph (B) of section 2010(c)(3) of such Code is amended– (A) by striking ‘2011’ in the matter preceding clause (i) and inserting ‘2012’, and (B) by striking ‘2010’ in clause (ii) and inserting ‘2000’. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 3:03 am
He's someone who matters. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 8:01 am
Today, OFAC has added [SDNTK] Entries to the Specially Designated Nationals List (SDN List): The following [SDNTK] entries have been added to OFAC’s SDN list: AGROPECUARIA LA PERLA LTDA. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 3:27 pm
Your choice does matter. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 11:20 am
” See Testimony of Nancy J. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 5:25 pm
” See Testimony of Nancy J. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 9:57 am
J. [read post]
25 Dec 2011, 3:05 pm
This court holds that it is not necessary to order a separate best interests hearing relative to (Vernon J. v. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 9:25 am
Justice Dalveer BhandariSupreme Court of IndiaThe Supreme Court in Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre Vs. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 10:01 am
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Unpublished Opinion in the following matter: DA 11-0409, 2011 MT 318N, IN THE MATTER OF: J.P.M., A Youth in Need of Care. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 5:17 am
Remember attorney Mitchell J. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 8:45 am
People caught in a cycle of addiction, crime and unemployment are as a practical matter unavailable for productive employment and responsible parenting of children they help bring into the world. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 4:40 am
by Lloyd J. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 3:07 am
In general, a hearing is required to determine whether a client has cause for discharging an attorney (see Teichner v W & J Holsteins, 64 NY2d 977, 979; Ulico Cas. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:24 pm
John M. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 2:55 pm
Your choice does matter. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:17 am
by John J. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:10 am
Waxman apologized, and Justice Kagan started to ask a question, the Chief Justice persisted, “I’m still trying to get to the point of the fact that he was retiring. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:25 am
Articles 34 and 36 of the Uncitral Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration: The Court's Discretion Amokura Kawharu Faculty of Law, University of Auckland Abstract: The opening paragraph of art 34(2) Model Law provides that “an arbitral award may be set aside by the court…”. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am
Canadian homeowners, residents, industry, regulators and appellate courts really do need certainty on the following key issues: (i) the threshold effect for liability m nuisance m the context of environmental or contamination; (ii) the requirements for a “non-natural” use ofland; (iii) whether environmental statutory regimes are a complete code of liability; and (iv) whether property devaluation should be a recognized claim in nuisance. [read post]
