Search for: "Mark C. Good"
Results 3461 - 3480
of 5,964
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2014, 12:00 am
Jordan, PhD, the Neaves Distinguished Professor of Religion and Politics at the John C. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 1:58 am
However, now that it is heading on appeal to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) as Case C-622/13 P, it has regained its pristine topicality -- so here it is.In April 2002 Castel Frères applied to register as a Community trade mark (CTM) the word CASTEL for ‘alcoholic beverages (except beers)’ in Class 33; the word was duly registered as a CTM. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 12:22 am
Some good jazz to reflect upon it here. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 6:22 am
Stock, supra (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 6:05 am
” This is all good. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 6:05 am
” This is all good. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 6:56 am
RU 14 is not a registered trade mark in Canada. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 4:00 pm
The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU)'s Medion decision [Case C-120/04, noted by the IPKat here] has been the subject of some consternation for trade mark applicants, and in Case C-591/12 P, the case of BIMBO DOUGHNUTS, they were left in a hole. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 6:53 am
§6(c).Maj. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 1:33 am
Some brokers use bench-marking (i.e., comparing companies of the same size to see what the “the other guy” buys). [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 1:33 am
Some brokers use bench-marking (i.e., comparing companies of the same size to see what the “the other guy” buys). [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 11:15 pm
Active again on Class 46, Edith Van den Eede tells how an Italian court can order the publication of its decision in a trade mark infringement action, even when counterfeit goods have not been used and the plaintiff has suffered no loss. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 8:56 am
C–13–04816, 2014 WL 171546 (N.D. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 7:14 am
The statutory damages range goes from a minimum of $1,000 “per counterfeit mark per type of goods or services sold” for non-willful infringement, to a maximum of $2,000,000 per instance of willful infringement. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 1:06 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2014) I have been following recent discussion about law and ethics with some interest. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
This is actually a good thing. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 5:30 am
Computer and Internet Law Weekly Updates for 2014-01-11: Court addresses whether a limit of liability clause c… http://t.co/3h4Tx2FgbJ -> The Simpsons “Steal This”, an Episode about Copyright http://t.co/LWPi4O2lFR -> The Treacherous Gap Between Goods and Services in Trade-marks Law | snIP/ITs http://t.co/CHQeobE3Fo -> Getty & AFP Appeal $1.2 Million Copyright Infringement Verdict – PetaPixel http://t.co/XSue6Wkg0k -> Dude, You… [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 5:30 am
Computer and Internet Law Weekly Updates for 2014-01-11: Court addresses whether a limit of liability clause c… http://t.co/3h4Tx2FgbJ -> The Simpsons “Steal This”, an Episode about Copyright http://t.co/LWPi4O2lFR -> The Treacherous Gap Between Goods and Services in Trade-marks Law | snIP/ITs http://t.co/CHQeobE3Fo -> Getty & AFP Appeal $1.2 Million Copyright Infringement Verdict – PetaPixel http://t.co/XSue6Wkg0k -> Dude, You… [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 3:32 am
Whether this is a good or a bad thing is a question this Kat prefers not to answer… (Merpel adds: can’t we all get along?) [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 10:12 am
--in America's Gilded Capital by Mark Leibovich (2013 [cd, unabridged]35. [read post]
