Search for: "Matter of Kennedy" Results 3461 - 3480 of 4,835
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2019, 7:39 am by Pratheepan Gulasekaram
United States, decided in 2012 with Justices Anthony Kennedy and Antonin Scalia writing the majority opinion and a partial dissent, respectively. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 10:43 am by Lyle Denniston
Kennedy, from continuing to explore just what the dimensions of that privacy right might be. [read post]
19 Jun 2006, 8:07 pm
I also think Scalia and Kennedy's decisions will go a far way in getting better instructions in 1983 actions.That's all for now. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 7:30 am by Amy Howe
If (as seems very possible) eight justices have already made up their minds, all that really matters may be what Gorsuch thinks. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Fla. 2021) (discussing termination of food service contract that was apparently based in part at opposition to the contractor's criticism of Black Lives Matter protests); Amara Omeokwe, Economist Urged to Drop Post Atop Journal After Criticizing Black Lives Matter, Wall St. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 11:57 am by Patrick T. Ryan
”  Rather, Justice Kennedy’s majority opinion said, the use of sampling and averages was permissible here because a single employee could have used that type of evidence in an individual, non-class case to calculate his or her own uncompensated overtime pay. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 11:45 am by Andres
What matters is the idea, and the idea is the Free Internet, nothing must get in its way. [read post]
27 May 2015, 3:41 pm
 First, infringement and invalidity are separate matters under patent law. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 12:26 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
  No real explanation on the first matter (the waiver), while the second suggestion was dismissed as "too complicated, and the opposing attorney will never go for it anyway. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 2:30 pm by Guest Blogger
  But, in a similar vein, not a few progressives are quibbling about results that didn’t nail down a 100% match with their policy and political goals, oblivious to plain-as-day legal constraints that any judge, no matter how left-leaning, would have been bound to respect. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 6:20 pm
Galloway, 572 U.S. 565,), legislative prayer has become the vehicle for advancing a constitutionalization of history and tradition as a predicate to adjudging the legitimacy of religious practice in a number of other contexts (Kennedy v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 5:58 am by Bernard Bell
Charter Fishing Trip“To Have and Have Not” (Warner Bros. 1944) The National Marine Fisheries Service (“NMFS”) published a rule requiring owner and operators of for-hire vessel operating in the Gulf of Mexico to (1) install GPS devices that constantly archived the vessel’s locations, and (2) allow federal fisheries enforcement personnel access to the information. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 9:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Nor would I say that oral argument never matters. [read post]
10 May 2013, 1:35 pm by Ronald Collins
The following is a series of questions posed by Ronald Collins on the occasion of the publication of Marcia Coyle’s The Roberts Court: The Struggle for the Constitution (Simon & Schuster, May 2013). [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 3:02 pm
But Justice Kennedy said that, at this moment, this provision has never been enforced. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 8:18 am by Michael Klarman
Justice Kennedy’s majority opinion in Windsor emphasized that the federal government has traditionally deferred to state definitions of marriage. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:10 am by Edward Hartnett
  Particularly telling, perhaps, is that Justice Kennedy noted that “it seems to me that at the end of the day it’s going to be something very close to interest of justice. [read post]