Search for: "Matter of Rules Adoption" Results 3461 - 3480 of 22,063
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2017, 10:10 am by Associates and Bruce L. Scheiner
  The ruling, In Re: Amendments to the Florida Evidence Code, the court declined to adopt the standard, noting a number of arguments made by opponents raised concerns about constitutionality. [read post]
1 May 2008, 3:58 pm
For the first time, a court has endorsed Corp Fin’s view that a proposal that involves some significant policy matters can nonetheless be excluded under Rule 14a-8(i)(7) to the extent that the proposal also deals with core ordinary business matters; here for example, advertising, marketing, sales and charitable giving. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 3:26 pm by slkimbro
The complainant alleged that when an attorney paid a fee on a per lead basis (instead of the traditional flat fee directory model), the payment violated Rule 7.2 of the Model Rules of Professional Conduct, as adopted by most state bar associations, which prohibits a lawyer for paying a non-attorney for the recommendation of his/her services. [read post]
29 May 2022, 12:51 pm by Eugene Volokh
But that rule is limited to religious displays, because the First Amendment restricts establishment of religion. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 7:21 pm by Joy Waltemath
First, in a late August decision that the concurring judge said “substantially unravels FedEx’s business model,” the Ninth Circuit ruled in two companion decisions that FedEx delivery drivers are employees, not independent contractors, as a matter of California and Oregon law. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 1:18 pm by Mary Picard
It doesn’t matter if their existing plan does not currently qualify as “comparable” under the ORPP rules. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 1:19 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
In cases where a party seeks to seal an otherwise public record, the matter rests with the discretion of the family court judge assigned to the case.info@clarkstonlegal.comwww.clarkstonlegal.com [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 2:02 pm by Mack Sperling
  He was quoted in a news article as saying: One of the better arguments for a presumption that courts of the state of incorporation will handle internal affairs disputes is that those courts are more experienced in the matter and are the ultimate source of definitive legal rulings. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
The court noted that, in Pennsylvania, as in a majority of jurisdiction, the “cause” approach has been adopted. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 1:06 pm by Astarita
Diamond joined Chairman Clayton’s office in July 2018 and, among other things, served in a leading role in completing the Commission’s recently adopted rules and interpretations governing the standards of conduct for financial professionals. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 12:28 pm by Glenn R. Reiser
Div. 1965), New Jersey courts have adopted a “good cause” standard to compel the production of a litigant’s income tax returns. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 5:01 am by Unknown
, Tax versus Fee: The Difference Can Matter, When is a “Tax” Not a Tax? [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 2:10 pm by Bill Otis
As a matter of Constitutional law, it seems to me that the dissents in Miller had the better of the argument. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 2:55 am
The proposal would have amended the California Rules of Professional Conduct and the California Rules of Court. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 1:30 pm by Arthur F. Coon
”  As a preliminary matter, the Court gave short shrift to the City’s argument that the case was moot because the challenged historicity determination had been rescinded and replaced by the City’s later resolutions adopted to comply with the trial court’s writ; effective relief could still be granted because if the Court were to agree with plaintiff it could order the trial court to vacate its writ and issue a new one requiring an EIR, which might lead… [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 6:07 am by Lyle Denniston
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, ruled that Texas did have standing under the drivers’ license expenses theory. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 5:36 am
  Once you understand the distinction between default rules and mandatory rules, additional questions arise: as a matter of normative contract theory, which rules should be default rules and which rules should be mandatory? [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 11:26 am by Eugene Volokh
Now this sort of balancing might look fine if you really trust judges to balance such matters impartially. [read post]