Search for: "Minnesota Litigator"
Results 3461 - 3480
of 4,168
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2010, 6:18 am
I clearly meet the litigation requirements and plan to sit for the exam in April. [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 10:59 am
All cases from across the country, no matter where they have been filed, have been consolidated into one place: the federal court District of Minnesota in a Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) action because they are all of a similar type and have common facts relevant to all of them. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 1:45 pm
Jimmy Tabb, defense counsel for named defendant Spencer Burkholz, argued at great length (some might say excessive length) that the litigation privilege under California law applies here and bars plaintiffs' claims against his client (click here for seminal Minnesota case on the litigation privilege). [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 11:08 pm
It also reversed the dismissal of dozens of cases that the lower court ruled should not have been part of the litigation because they duplicated claims pending in California. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 5:23 am
., TMJ Implants Products Liability Litigation, 872 F. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 5:14 pm
District Court for the District of Minnesota appointed Kotchen & Low LLP as Co-Lead Interim Class Counsel in In re Wholesale Grocery Products Antitrust Litigation, MDL 2090. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 9:00 am
If you think of a Möbius strip as a loop turning infinitely in upon itself, it might be an apt metaphor for the strange scenario playing out in federal courts in Minnesota and in Indiana where a company, Loparex, is doing battle on two fronts in litigation arising out of the acquisition of a business followed by a parting of ways of the acquired business' executives (allegations of non-competition agreements, confidential business information, etc.). [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 4:08 pm
Avery Dennison Corp (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) Juniper – Juniper appeals dismissal of declaratory judgment complaint based on lack of personal jurisdiction: Juniper Networks v SSL Service (PATracer) Lincoln Electric Company - ALJ Rogers denies motion to preclude respondents, ESAB and Sidergas, from relying on prior art not produced in certain bulk welding wire containers (337-TA-686) (ITC Law Blog) Litepanels - Litepanels asserts film production LED lighting patents against Dot Line… [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 3:15 pm
The Minnesota Journal of International Law has an article by Jessica J. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 1:59 pm
The Minnesota Supreme Court issued an Order consolidating Minnesota's Intoxilyzer 5000 Source Code cases. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 4:13 pm
Comment: Minnesota, Arizona and Missouri have long been the epicenter of consent judgment disputes. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 12:06 pm
Here’s a link to the slip opinion: In re Baycol Products Litigation, No. 09-1069 (8th Cir., Jan. 5 2010). [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 4:27 pm
This inquiry was posed to my colleague, Joel O'Malley, who works out of our Minneapolis office but who is licensed in both Minnesota and California. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 3:30 pm
On to the Minnesota Supreme Court again or is it finally time to throw in the towel? [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 2:29 pm
The challenge by Michigan has lately drawn the support of neighboring states; Minnesota and Ohio have already joined in, and Indiana has said that it plans to do so. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 1:11 pm
While agreeing that insurers should not be permitted to “hover in the background at critical settlement negotiations” resisting all responsibility on the basis of lack of consent, the Court of Appeal held that the bankruptcy court’s confirmation of the Section 524(g) plan could not be read to preclude the right of the carriers to subsequently litigate the issue of whether the plan was unfair, unreasonable or the product of fraud or collusion. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 12:16 pm
The litigation campaign is winding down. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 9:01 pm
Click Here The New Climate Litigation. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:23 am
., v Newkirk Products, Inc (Docket Report) District Court Delaware: Failure to allege time period of infringement warrants dismissal of infringement claim: Quantum Loyalty Systems Inc. et al. v TPG Rewards Inc (Patent Infringement Blog) District Court Minnesota requires defendant to pay fees for supplemental Markman briefing: Northbrook Digital, LLC v. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 6:27 pm
Litig., 25 No. 11 Andrews Pharmaceutical Litig. [read post]
