Search for: "People v. Mays" Results 3461 - 3480 of 44,340
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2009, 5:03 pm
Well maybe we're about to find out.Patco Construction Company, Inc. v People's United Bank dba Ocean Bank, no pending in state court in Maine, may tell us just whose fault it really is, besides the cyber criminal of course.Patco was a long time customer of the bank but after losing hundreds of thousands of dollars from online theft and then getting a notice from the bank that they wanted Patco to pay it back, they decided they had enough. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 1:00 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  The policy choices may be to tell people how they have to present numerators v. denominators. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 12:08 pm
 Yeah, it's a hassle that some people drive in cans from Arizona to redeem them in California. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 4:00 pm
Many people assume a criminal case ends upon conviction and sentencing. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 4:01 pm by Barry Barnett
You may recall, as Blawgletter fondly does, a Simpsons episode featuring a monorail that an itinerant huckster -- Lyle Lanley -- convinced the good people of Springfield to buy for $3 million. [read post]
16 May 2018, 2:35 pm by Karen Gullo
In the case before the New York court, People v Perkins, border agents stopped a traveler at JFK International Airport after a flight from Canada. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 6:11 pm by Maria Hook
By Jack Wass (Stout Street Chambers, Wellington, New Zealand)   In the recent decision of Hebei Huaneng Industrial Development Co Ltd v Shi,[1] the High Court of New Zealand was faced with an argument that a money judgment of the Higher People’s Court of Hebei should not be enforced because the courts of China are not independent of the political arms of government and therefore do not qualify as “courts” for the purpose of New Zealand’s rules on the… [read post]
29 May 2020, 11:42 pm by Josh Blackman
[Chief Justice Roberts, still haunted by the ghost of Lochner, may be trending towards Garcia v. [read post]