Search for: "Person v. Person" Results 3461 - 3480 of 123,220
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2024, 1:50 am by CMS
In Pimlico Plumbers Ltd and Mullins v Smith [2018] UKSC 29, the Supreme Court held that the sole test in deciding whether someone is a worker is whether there is an obligation of personal performance. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
You are probably well acquainted with its successor, rule 506.[2] Prior to the adoption of former rule 146 in April 1974, the Commission did not have rules interpreting section 4(2) of the Securities Act.[3] As a result, issuers faced uncertainty in determining whether a sale of securities did not involve “any public offering” and in applying case law on the topic, including the Supreme Court’s decision in SEC v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 4:31 pm
For example, we exclude lots of truthful evidence when there's a violation of Miranda, and I personally think that opinion advances the interests of justice. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
On 1 December 2023, Jay J handed down judgment in Dyson v MGN Ltd [2023] EWHC 3092 (KB). [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 4:09 pm
(D) Neither (A) nor (B).Personally, I think that (D) is the answer least likely to be true.Regardless, the defendant is sentenced to death, and the California Supreme Court unanimously affirms. [read post]
On a recent episode of the Stanford Law School (SLS) podcast, Stanford Legal, Professor Barton “Buzz” Thompson, JD/MBA ’76 (BA ’72), delved into the subject of his most recent book, Liquid Asset: How Business and Government Can Partner to Solve the Freshwater Crisis. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 5:55 am by Tomaso Falchetta
It further specifies that “States Parties shall not be required to transfer personal data in accordance with this Convention if the data cannot be provided in compliance with their applicable laws concerning the protection of personal data. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
Both sets of arguments rely on a formalistic conception of separation of powers.Overrule Chevron, conservative Justices and advocates say, because Article III gives "the judicial power" to courts; judicial power is, as Chief Justice Marshall said for the Court in Marbury v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 3:32 am by Peter J. Sluka
When a closely-held business is profitable, self-interested owners naturally want a bigger slice of the pie, especially where the personal relationships among the owners are frayed. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 3:28 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Therefore, defendant’s reading must be adopted (Shaw v Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 1:10 am by INFORRM
Nor had he alleged any personal involvement with the banned users. [read post]