Search for: "Public Service Co. v. State"
Results 3461 - 3480
of 5,843
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2011, 1:38 am
HolderDocket: 10-545Issue(s): (1) Does the Progress Clause of the United States Constitution, Article I, § 8, cl. 8, prohibit Congress from taking works out of the public domain? [read post]
9 Nov 2006, 9:46 pm
Häupl - the AG opinesThe IPKat's incredibly productive and enthusiastic friend Tibor Gold has given him a clue concerning the recent Opinion of Advocate-General Dámaso Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer in Case C-246/05 Armin Häupl v Lidl Stiftung & Co. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 10:44 pm
Roberts included the same citation in his dissent from Campbell-Ewald Co. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 3:34 pm
Co. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 6:26 am
Compiled from online public domain resources, provided for your review/use is this week's update of key industry news, views, and events highlighting key electronic discovery related stories, developments, and announcements. [read post]
23 Jun 2013, 9:15 am
Co. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 8:02 am
* Good news: I will receive the 2011 "IP Vanguard Award" (in the Academic/Public Policy category) from the California State Bar's IP Section. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm
The new rules were rolled out first as regulations from the Texas State Department of State Health Services (DSHS). [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 6:51 am
Tickets.com, Inc., 54 U.S.P.Q.2d 1344, 1346 (C.D.Cal., 2000).[7] See DeJohn v. [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 12:50 pm
In Honda Motor Co v Oberg (512 U.S. 415 (1994)), for instance, Ginsburg dissented from the Court’s decision that an amendment to the Oregon Constitution that prevented review of a punitive-damage award violated the Due Process Clause of the federal Constitution, referring to other protections against excessive punitive-damage awards in Oregon law. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 9:18 am
In that case, Pietrylo v. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
(ITC 337 Law Blog) Academic perspectives on issues raised in Bilski case (IP Osgoode) Star Scientific teaches a valuable lesson to all IP share investors (IAM) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Appealing BPAI rejections to the Federal Circuit: In re Baggett (nonprecedential) (Patently-O) CAFC: Preliminary injunctions and obviousness in design patent law: Titan Tire Corp v Case New Holland, Inc (Patently-O) District Court N D Illinois: Post-filing assignment cannot create standing:… [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 4:32 pm
”) Power had a service that let users aggregate their contacts on different social media sites. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 8:42 am
Napo tell me that: Napo was introduced into Cafcass by the Family Court Welfare Officers who transferred from the Probation Service and it became the largest Trade Union in Cafcass with joint negotiating rights for Family Court Advisers (the main grade practitioners in both Private and Public Law), Service Managers and Family Support Workers. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 4:16 pm
United States [read post]
25 Nov 2021, 7:59 am
’ ” Carriuolo, 823 F.3d at 983–84 (quoting State, Office of the Att’y Gen. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 12:08 pm
Otsuka Holdings Co., in the Northern District of Illinois; United States ex rel. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 9:29 am
See United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 2:39 am
These include information on the applicant's race, religion, national origin, age, pregnancy status, marital status, disability, sexual orientation (some state and local jurisdictions), gender expression or identity (some state and local jurisdictions) and genetic information. [read post]
1 May 2024, 3:09 pm
Catholic Relief Services, 618 F. [read post]
