Search for: "Queen v. Queen"
Results 3461 - 3480
of 4,043
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2022, 4:50 pm
In the case of Courtney v Cayman News Service Ltd & Ors [2022] QSC 37 Jackson J dismissed an application for summary judgment by the plaintiff Canada CBC reports that a Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench judge has ordered CBC Manitoba to pay court costs to a Winnipeg man after finding its coverage about the man was defamatory. [read post]
21 May 2012, 4:54 am
Last week’s resolved cases include: Mr John Donovan v Metro, Clause 1, 21/05/2012; Lesley Archer v The Echo (Southend), Clause 1, 18/05/2012; Ms Nicola Searle v South Wales Echo, Clauses 1, 3, 17/05/2012; Mr Liam Fairlie v North Devon Journal, Clause 1, 17/05/2012; Mr Ronald Baird v Northampton Chronicle & Echo, Clause 1, 17/05/2012; Mr Ronald Baird v The Sun, Clause 1, 17/05/2012; Mr Ronald Baird v Daily Mirror, Clause 1,… [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 2:28 pm
Lebowitz The author is a Queens County Supreme Court justice. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- OCA Not Proper Party In Judges' Pay Suit September 14, 2007 To the Editor, In the Law Journal on Sept. 11, page 2 (see below), the attorney for the judges who are petitioners in Maron v. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:25 am
Justice Tugendhat of the England and Wales High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) in Adelson & Anor v Anderson & Anor [2011] EWHC 2497 (QB) (07 October 2011) neatly summarizes the differing approaches to freedom of speech and right to reputation (including public figures) in the US and England as follows: 73. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 11:24 am
The law allows the state controller to sell off or destroy the unclaimed property of persons considered “unknown to the State” – which, the petitioners claim, includes such obscure figures as Queen Elizabeth, Vladimir Putin, George W. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
Funk v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 5:55 am
Mosley v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 4:48 pm
These cases range from ZH (Tanzania) v SSHD [2011] UKSC 4 (an immigration case) and ETK v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 439 through to PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2016] UKSC 26. [read post]
9 May 2022, 1:35 am
Data Privacy and Data Protection The UK government will announce its new data protection reform bill during the Queen’s Speech on 10 May 2022. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 4:29 pm
The Administrative Court will give judgment in the facial recognition case of The Queen (on the application of Bridges) v Chief Constable of South Wales Police on 4 September 2019. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 5:08 pm
In the Canadian case of Manson v. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 10:07 am
Pedestrian trip and fall lawsuit leads to renovation of hazardous sidewalk in Sunnyside, Queens. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 8:13 am
Metropolitan v. [read post]
21 Mar 2009, 5:38 pm
[See, See R. v. [read post]
How Jack Smith May Charge Trump PAC with Fraudulent Fundraising Within the Bounds of First Amendment
24 Aug 2023, 5:55 am
Madigan v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 12:17 am
I am indebted to Professor Ian Walden of the School of Law, Queen Mary, University of London for the case I'm going to write about.The case is R. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 12:56 am
R on The Application of Kirsty Green – Claimant -v- Gloucestershire County Council – Defendant -and- The Queen on The Application of (1) James Rowe – Claimant (2) Rebecca Hird November 16, 2011 Council’s withdrawal of library funding leading to closures was unlawful as failed to discharge public sector equality duties. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions In Saint John (City) v Ferguson, 2012 NBQB 46 the Court of Queen’s Bench in New Brunswick determined that the Board of Trustees of the City of Saint John Employee Pension Plan had standing to bring proceedings for defamation. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 11:05 am
In the second case, Meredith v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 4:06 pm
The criteria for judicial review of a hearing and a Judge's decision are set out in The Queen on the application of Strickson v Preston County Court & Ors [2007] EWCA Civ 1132, to the effect that the Administrative Court must be "vigilant to see that only truly exceptional cases - where there has indeed been a frustration or corruption of the judicial process - are allowed to proceed to judicial review". [read post]
