Search for: "R. B."
Results 3461 - 3480
of 55,757
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2014, 9:40 am
Even if a party files a plea in abatement in County B, but he continues to participate in the litigation in County B, even to the point of reaching a settlement agreement and consenting to final judgment, he cannot then later challenge County B’s subordinate jurisdiction and seek to return to County A. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 4:46 am
R. of Civ. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 2:28 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Tamiz (Aka Miah) & Ors v R [2010] EWCA Crim 2638 (12 November 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) RH v South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1273 (12 November 2010) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) BJM v Nathan Eyre & Ors [2010] EWHC 2856 (QB) (12 November 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) Abbassi & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department… [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 4:19 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Litwinski & Ors v CPS [2011] EWCA Crim 727 (24 March 2011) F, R v [2011] EWCA Crim 726 (24 March 2011) High Court (Administrative Court) Janovic v Prosecutor General’s Office Lithuania [2011] EWHC 710 (Admin) (25 March 2011) Totel Ltd, R (on the application of) v The First Tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) & Ors [2011] EWHC 652 (Admin) (24 March 2011) High Court (Chancery Division) Ludlam v Courtman & Anor [2011] EWHC 742 (Ch) (25… [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 7:50 am
On appeal, the Third Circuit affirmed the denial of the suppression motion.First, the Court held that although a Pennsylvania Magisterial Court Judge is not a judge of a state court of record as Rule 41(b) requires, Rule 41(b) does not apply here because the search was a state search in character: among other things, the search warrant was issued at the request of a state trooper indicating a violation of state law, and federal involvement in the search and seizure was, under the… [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:49 am
Latvia (Application No. 27853/09), Grand Chamber)), and B. c. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 8:39 am
Filed: July 8, 2014Opinion by: Ronald B. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 8:08 am
Specifically, the 2015 premium varies by income from $104.90 to $335.70 per month, and the Part B deductible is $147.00 for all Part B beneficiaries. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 3:30 am
This statute further states in paragraph (b)(II)(B)(2) that for the purposes of an action brought pursuant to this section and section 10-3-1116, an insurer's delay or denial was unreasonable if the... . [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 11:34 am
Finally, CMS published the 2013 Medicare Part B premium amounts (which vary by income from $104.90 to $335.70 per month) and the Part B deductible, which for 2013 is $147.00 for all Part B beneficiaries. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 9:00 pm
Peck ordered the defendants “to revise their Responses to comply with the Rules”, specifically Rule 34(b)(2)(B) and Rule 34(b)(2)(C), amended in December 2015 requiring objections to be stated with specificity and directing that an objection must state whether any responsive materials are being withheld on the basis of that objection. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 6:41 am
r 1. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 8:20 am
The Justice many suggested would take on the bureaucratic state, keeps getting outraged lately at the concept of judicial review over bureaucrats. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 2:58 pm
In a letter to Senate Banking Committee Chair Tim Johnson (D-SD)and Ranking Member Richard Shelby (R-AL), Sec Chair Mary Schapiro said that the Jumpstart Our Business Startups (JOBS) Act, HR 3606, passed by the House would weaken investor protections by, for example, exempting emerging growth companies from the internal control auditor attestation provisions of Section 404(b) of Sarbanes-Oxley. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 12:25 am
Das Bundesgericht gibt der Schwyzer Oberstaatsanwaltschaft mit dem für die amtliche Sammlung bestimmten Urteil (1B_232/2011) vom 12. [read post]
19 Sep 2009, 5:22 am
EKÄ°M AYI YAKLAÅžIRKEN, MECLÄ°S AÃâ [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 12:45 am
Die EU und auch die Schweiz müssen die USA darauf verpflichten, dass für ihre Bürgerinnen und Bürger ein angemessenes Datenschutzniveau mit einem wirksamen Rechtsschutz im jeweiligen Wohnsitzland besteht. [read post]
4 May 2020, 8:07 am
List B includes documents that establish identity. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 11:59 am
§§ 315(b). 35 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 3:15 am
Further, “stockpiling” a product prior to the bar date is not a “commercialization” that would trigger § 102(b). [read post]