Search for: "Roll v. Roll" Results 3461 - 3480 of 6,809
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2014, 6:34 am by Dean Freeman
Additional Resources: Victims of crash involving black bear identified, Dec. 8, 2014, Sun-Sentinel More Blog Entries: Allstate v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 9:47 pm by Patent Docs
Recently, Jon Potter and Julie Samuels published a piece in Roll Call, urging Congress to pass comprehensive patent reform legislation to clamp down on NPEs, while James Bessen, in The Atlantic, lauded the Supreme Court's recent Alice Corp. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 9:36 pm by Deborah Darin
Smith holds his own and rolls with the interruptions. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 4:30 am
During the roll-out of the Alcotest, twenty individuals charged with DWI challenged the admissibility of their Alcotest results, and their cases were consolidated for consideration of the evidentiary challenge. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 7:26 am by Joy Waltemath
Nevertheless, in view of changed circumstances, the appeals court concluded that an injunction was not just and proper because it could not restore the status quo as it existed prior to the unfair labor practices (Paulsen v. [read post]
13 Dec 2014, 12:35 am by Jon Gelman
Flanking them were James Sherk, also of the Heritage Foundation, and William Messenger, the attorney from the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation who argued Harris v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 6:13 am
On May 30, 2014, GDF reported its findings:GDF concluded that the computer clock setting had been intentionally manipulated to roll the computer date backwards to December 1999. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 2:00 pm by John Elwood
Monday thinned the relist rolls considerably as the Court granted cert. in a trio of cases – thus preserving the relist streak (aside from the Long Conference grants). [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 7:21 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
One guy happily filled up a shopping cart with stuff and rolled it right out the front door. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 3:18 am by Samuel Sherwood, Olswang LLP
The Supreme Court’s reasoning was as follows: Non-disclosure of the commissions Lord Sumption held that the decision in Harrison v Black Horse Ltd, the leading Court of Appeal authority, was wrong. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 2:54 am
What an enchanting, mysterious title, how mellifluously it rolls off the tongue -- and how surprised he was, as a feline with very little French, to discover that this body was not a purveyor of soufflés or tasty chocolates at all, but a maker of presumably inedible rubber flooring  products. [read post]