Search for: "STATE v CLARK" Results 3461 - 3480 of 3,829
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Oct 2008, 11:24 am
This exception is further explained in Article 15 of the Regulation which states that "lawsuits pending" should be governed by the law of the member state where the relevant lawsuit was commenced and in progress.Mr Justice Christopher Clarke, having considered the Regulation, the Virgos-Schmit report and available European and English authorities, held that arbitration proceedings which were pending at the time the insolvency proceedings were commenced fell… [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
ECJ clarifies rules relating to notice: K-Swiss Inc v OHIM (Class 46) EU Competitiveness Council resolution against counterfeiting and piracy (Class 46) EU states back three-point anti-piracy plan (Managing Intellectual Property) Fuel cells and wind power lead European patent filings for clean energy technology (Green Patent Blog) More non-minor geographical indicator (GI) amendments published (Class 46) No sign of any Community patent progress, despite Verheugen's optimism… [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 12:55 pm
Horsham Properties Group Ltd v (1) Paul Clark (2) Carol Beech and GMAC RFC Ltd (Third Party) and The Secretary of State for Justice (Intervener) [2008] EWHC 2327 (Ch) Now this is a complicated little case which, I suspect, will give rise to more questions (and litigation) than it answered. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 9:25 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) St George v The Home Office [2008] EWCA Civ 1068 (08 October 2008) Symbian Ltd v Comptroller General of Patents [2008] EWCA Civ 1066 (08 October 2008) Behzadi v Behzadi [2008] EWCA Civ 1070 (08 October 2008) Orchard (Developments) Holdings Plc v Reuters Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 1017 (02 September 2008) JN (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 1018 (02 September 2008) HJ (Iran)… [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 8:49 am
Horsham Properties Group Ltd v Clark and another (Secretary of State for Justice intervening) [2008] EWHC 2327 (Ch); [2008] WLR (D) 307 “The exercise of a statutory power of sale under s 101 of the Law of Property Act 1925 after a relevant default by the mortgagor was not a deprivation of possessions within the meaning of art 1of the First Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 9:23 pm
Consider a case like United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 7:43 pm
He flies to Boston every week during the fall to teach with Robert Clark, Harvard Law’s former dean and a leading corporate law scholar. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 7:50 pm
Alexander, No. 071780 In a conviction for sale of controlled substance in or near school grounds, denial of writ of habeas corpus is affirmed over claims that the state courts unreasonably applied Batson v. [read post]
27 Sep 2008, 2:47 am
At the Supreme Court, the case is CR 07-1276, Anna Clark v. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 9:17 am
There was no underlying opinion as this was a direct appeal.Arsenio Carlos Clarke v. [read post]