Search for: "See v. See" Results 3461 - 3480 of 122,055
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Dec 2021, 5:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
In this decisions the Appellate Division explains that "[n]o appeal lies from the denial of a motion to reargue (see Budin v Davis, 172 AD3d 1676, 1679 [2019]) and, therefore, the only issue before it in its considering this action was the propriety of the Supreme Court's denial of petitioner's motion to renew. [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In this decisions the Appellate Division explains that "[n]o appeal lies from the denial of a motion to reargue (see Budin v Davis, 172 AD3d 1676, 1679 [2019]) and, therefore, the only issue before it in its considering this action was the propriety of the Supreme Court's denial of petitioner's motion to renew. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 9:24 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
The Supreme Court of India has been vascillating between two views on the Law of the Arbitration Agreement: according to the first view, as held in NTPC v Singer (See this post) and recently in Sakuma Exports v Louis Dreyfus Commodities (28.03.2014) the proper law of the contract is chosen, in the absence of unmistakable intention to the contrary, the same would be the law of the arbitration agreement; the second view, as decided recently in Enercon GmbH… [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  In this decisions the Appellate Division explains that "[n]o appeal lies from the denial of a motion to reargue (see Budin v Davis, 172 AD3d 1676, 1679 [2019]) and, therefore, the only issue before it in its considering this action was the propriety of the Supreme Court's denial of petitioner's motion to renew. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 2:50 pm
See, e.g., McDonnell Douglas XIII; McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 7:00 am
See, e.g., McDonnell Douglas XIII; McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 4:47 pm by Rick.Hasen@lls.edu
See this post about this amicus brief filed by the Constitutional Accountability Center.... [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 11:31 am by Howard Friedman
Responding rather quickly to a filing with it of a "Notice Suggesting Improper or Unethical Conduct" on the part of defendants (see prior posting), a federal district court in Allen v. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 8:13 am
Moskovitz lawsuit to see a local government running wild against free speech. [read post]