Search for: "Sharp v. Sharp"
Results 3461 - 3480
of 4,115
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2019, 7:30 am
Then much hemming and hawing ensued with citations to Dixie Dairies Corp. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 8:16 am
As was demonstrated in the Supreme Court case of FCC v. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 9:52 am
On similar facts in State v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 6:06 am
“Expect a shock,” said Michael V. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 4:37 am
” (People v. [read post]
26 Jan 2008, 1:08 pm
Monsanto Co. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 6:50 am
French ‘3 strikes’ law now legal (Ars Technica) (IP Watch) Chinese authors condemn Google book deal (Managing Intellectual Property) (China Blawg) (China Hearsay) Global Global - General Happy 40th birthday internet (Securing Innovation) Global - Copyright Anti-piracy laws and lawsuits fail to change social norms (TorrentFreak) Discussion of Alan Kaufman’s ‘The Electronic Book Burning’ (1709 Copyright Blog) Paranoid… [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 1:28 am
Leave for prisoners to attend family funerals In Geantă and Others v Romania [2023] ECHR 36 [in French], the Fourth Section held that a refusal to allow prisoners leave to attend the funerals of close family members violated Article 8(1) of the Convention (respect for private and family life). [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 5:00 am
An Employee is Laid-Off Because of COVID-19 In the recent decision Chalmers v Airways Transit Service Ltd. [read post]
14 May 2012, 12:24 pm
However, there is no shortage of cases in which such appeals are dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because the original requests for payment did not constitute “claims” under the CDA.One recent illustration of this problem involved the distinction between routine and non-routine requests for payment, as addressed by a recent split-panel decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Parsons Global Services, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 4:11 am
As to the existing effectiveness of No Fault “cost controls,” here’s what the former Justice said in McGill v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 10:08 pm
Reade is slated to take over the case of U.S. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 10:43 pm
I'd also like to write some posts on scholarly technology, RSS readers and other tech related things (perhaps iPads v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 1:00 pm
v=wA3Tbs_FvAA http://www.youtube.com/user/NYCCouncil http://www.huffingtonpost.com/christine-c-quinn/lets-protect-our-children_b_1285346.html? [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 12:38 pm
Two decades after writing the landmark United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 9:38 am
But today the Supreme Court reversed the state court, in another sharp rebuke. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 3:33 am
They had not one but three Samsung 83" TVs, and two Sharp 108" TVs. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 4:24 am
What he’s referring to is the Supreme Court’s 1942 opinion, written by Justice Frank Murphy, in Chaplinksy v. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 8:23 pm
The same laundry-sorting can be seen in a Tony Mauro article from earlier this summer:The case of Bowles v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 6:36 am
” At PrawfsBlawg, Rick Hills analyzes the implications of last week’s decision in Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
