Search for: "Smith v. People"
Results 3461 - 3480
of 3,931
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2009, 1:49 pm
That ruling, U.S. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 12:12 pm
Smith, an important Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause property rights case that was heard by the Supreme Court today: Today, the Supreme Court hears Alvarez v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 4:50 am
"Every day, immigrants are advised to give up their rights and plead guilty to charges that subject them to lifetime exile," said Benita Jain, co-director of the Immigrant Defense Project.The second case argued Tuesday was Smith v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 1:42 am
A decision in the Ohio case, Smith v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 1:18 pm
Smith, Fellers v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 12:39 pm
(Smith is also a Market House Group member.) [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 5:55 am
Disproportionate Number of Outbreaks due to Raw Milk Consumption: Only ~1% of people drink raw milk in the United States, yet raw dairy products cause over 50% of the milkborne outbreaks W [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 8:33 am
It is fanciful to suppose that any of these people did not believe what they were saying. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 9:46 pm
It appears that nothing will change that conduct and that the Department bears grudges against people who engage lawyers, particularly competent ones.We ask that you please immediately summons the people in your case management area and ask them why it is that they have refused to correspond with me in accordance with Mr Boutsis' directions and requests, refused to provide reports to me, refused to progress his retirement and otherwise behaved in a shamefully non-communicative… [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 12:03 pm
That's the question my colleague, Shaun Martin, is asking over at his California Appellate Report blog, in connection with People v. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 10:27 am
But if Smith's guilty and my wife isn't, then theft is not a lesser included offense, since Smith would be guilty since he used forced but wouldn't be guilty if he didn't use force. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 9:10 pm
It's really, really hard to cross-examine a transcript, which is why those robed people in D.C. bothered to decide Crawford v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 4:47 pm
People v Lane, 7 NY3d 888, 889 [2006]; People v Payne, 3 NY3d 266, 273 [2004]; People v Hines, 97 NY2d 56, 61-62 [2001]).People v Kolupa, __ NY3d __, 2009 NY Slip Op 06586 [September 22, 2009].Would you want to be the attorney calling Mr. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 11:22 am
Especially when it's a rich dude getting completely off when people with far less influence and resources rot away. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 4:23 am
U.S. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 3:43 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Accordingly, assuming, without deciding, that Senator Skelos presently has standing to sue the Governor, we now proceed to the merits (see Matter of New York State Assn. of Criminal Defense Lawyers v Kaye, 96 NY2d 512, 516 [2001]; Babigian v Wachtler, 69 NY2d 1012, 1013 [1987]; Matter of Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany v New York State Dept. of Health, 66 NY2d 948, 951 [1985]). [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 2:16 pm
The three other people with correct answers are Erin Eurenius, Julie Hack and Victoria Smith. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 6:21 am
A shudder went through the state, and the state supreme court in People v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 7:05 am
., "People v. [read post]
