Search for: "Stark & Stark"
Results 3461 - 3480
of 3,626
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2007, 10:09 am
Chief among them to my mind are the proposed revisions to the Stark rule, or physician self-referral regulations. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 4:26 pm
“The blog keeps you connected to the community,” says Brian Murphy, a New Jersey-based attorney with Stark &;amp; Stark who updates the Nursing Home Law Blog. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 9:55 am
See my additional posts on proposed regs slipped into the fee schedule regarding the Stark physician self-referral prohibition rules, ambulance services and IDTFs. [read post]
8 Jul 2007, 6:00 am
Libby certainly knows who decided Plame’s identity should be leaked to the media. [read post]
7 Jul 2007, 7:47 am
Last fall, Korrell, a partner at Davis Wright &;amp; Tremaine, took their case to the U.S. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 6:25 am
Brenner, Chair and Shareholder of Stark &;amp; Stark's Construction Litigation Group. [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 5:28 am
Instead, as excerpted below, it is about different state responses and punishments for parents hosting teen parties and serving alcohol:[A] stark contrast in punishments is just one inconsistency in a patchwork of conflicting legal practices and public attitudes about underage drinking parties. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 10:47 am
Hours from now, a bunch of hungry and sun-baked activists will be wrapping up the 14th Annual Fast &;amp; Vigil in front of the steps of the U.S. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 9:32 am
The following commentary is from Andrew Pincus, a partner in Mayer, Brown, Rowe &;amp; Maw LLP, who filed an amicus brief for the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights and the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights Education Fund. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 6:07 am
" This week's New Jersey Legal Update podcast is presented by John MacDonald, Shareholder of Stark & Stark's Employment Litigation Group. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 6:39 am
Brenner, Chair and Shareholder of Stark &;amp; Stark's Construction Litigation Group. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 7:24 am
Nobody, however, should miss the stark reality about American government enshrined in the very heart of the Chief's majority opinion and saluted by all others, the war on crime (and its key federal component, the war on drugs) have reshaped the very meaning of education in America. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 4:50 pm
The blog is updated by Karl Romberger, Jr. of Stark and Stark law firm, and joins their collection of already active blogs. [read post]
24 Jun 2007, 7:21 am
Years after a well intentioned trackback to Hindered's blog post , Stark &;amp; Stark Attorney Bruce Stern*** has now regrettably been inveigled into a mess, that I'm sure he didn't sign on for, due to Hindered's unfiltered comments. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 6:12 am
This week's New Jersey Legal Update podcast is presented by Dave Byrne, Co-Chair and Shareholder of Stark & Stark's Community Associations Group. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 1:31 am
Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York (Paula-Rose Stark of counsel), for respondent. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 2:46 pm
Rudy quit the Iraq Study Group last May after he was told he would actually have to show up and work on the issue: Rudolph Giuliani's membership on an elite Iraq study panel came to an abrupt end last spring after he failed to show up for a single official meeting of the group, causing the panel's top Republican to give him a stark choice: either attend the meetings or quit, several sources said. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 8:30 am
About a month ago, Pete Stark held hearings on the subject of PFFS marketing, and said: "Given that half of the projected Medicare Advantage growth" is in the area of private fee-for-service plans, "we need to immediately evaluate its value before it gets unmanageable. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 7:26 am
The petition casts the issue in stark terms. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 10:59 am
That's a stark about-face for the U.S. since just last fall DHS Assistant Secretary Stewart Baker told the E.U. that earlier provisions limiting how the U.S. could share the data were now moot, that it could add more data elements to its request unilaterally, and that it planned to push to keep the data for longer than the 3.5 years it originally agreed to. [read post]
