Search for: "State v House" Results 3461 - 3480 of 28,760
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The Court’s approach to confidentiality Meade J began his analysis with a reminder of the key principles identified by the Court of Appeal in OnePlus v Mitsubishi ([2020] EWCA 1562). [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 3:34 am by SHG
Franklin also owns several firearms, which the Government contends “have long been recognized as being ‘tools of the drug trade.'” [Doc. 87 at 6 n.2 (quoting in part United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
Xu was indicted for committing the crime of subverting state power on 5 August 2021. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 4:47 pm
The House Report states that its purpose was to “improve intellectual property enforcement in the United States and abroad. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 8:32 am by Eugene Volokh
Franklin also owns several firearms, which the Government contends "have long been recognized as being 'tools of the drug trade.'" [Doc. 87 at 6 n.2 (quoting in part United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 5:01 am by Etta Lanum
By 1981, the Supreme Court was reviewing a sex discrimination case titled Rostker v. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 4:40 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
—In this paragraph, the terms ‘coercion’ and ‘commercial sex act’ have the meanings given the terms in section 1591(e) of title 18, United States Code. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 2:35 pm by John Elwood
Ross, 21-468Issues: (1) Whether allegations that a state law has dramatic economic effects largely outside of the state and requires pervasive changes to an integrated nationwide industry state a violation of the dormant commerce clause, or whether the extraterritoriality principle described in the Supreme Court’s decisions is now a dead letter; and (2) whether such allegations, concerning a law that is based solely on preferences regarding out-of-state… [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 12:14 pm by Rebecca Plevel
  She also ruled against the South Carolina State Election Commission in striking down a witness requirement for absentee voting during the height of the pandemic, in Middleton v. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 2:06 pm by admin
Scott Baldwin, Frederick Baron, Thomas V. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 2:00 am by Mark Schickman, Schickman Law
That section prohibits an employer from retaliating against an employee for sharing information he “has reasonable cause to believe . . . discloses a violation of state or federal statute” or of “a local, state, or federal rule or regulation” with a government agency, with a person with authority over the employee, or with another employee who has authority to investigate or correct all the violations. [read post]