Search for: "State v. Bias"
Results 3461 - 3480
of 5,337
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2012, 12:27 pm
In Harrell v Delaware North Companies (EDMich, October 3, 2012), a female employee filed gender bias and reprisal claims against two companies which argued they were not her employer. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 7:41 am
Supreme Court's decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 4:16 am
Judicial instinct vs. the quiet objection I was already thinking about judges' instinctive responses to juror bias issues because of People v. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 4:13 pm
United States, holding that Miranda v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 9:10 am
Co. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 8:31 am
In 1993, the Supreme Court unanimously upheld a virtually identical state law in Wisconsin v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 2:06 pm
The arbitration panel, relying upon the case of Ebinger v. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 4:48 pm
"This study showed this particular person [McClesky] was affected by racial bias," Schuwerk said. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 2:58 pm
The importance of this conflict of interest is illustrated by the recent decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in Schexnayder v. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 2:52 pm
Nov. 18, 2008)(Unpublished)Affirming dismissal of termination claim under state lawDC CircuitMontgomery v. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:44 pm
In Janus v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 5:25 pm
Hoehn, No. 11-16751 (9th Cir.) - United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 8:47 am
Reed v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 1:30 pm
’” Citing State v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 2:02 pm
Streck v. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 5:27 pm
To that end, the organization seeks to remove impediments, rather than put obstacles in the employee’s way: • A PIP is implemented in conjunction with HR to control for any unfair bias on the supervisor’s part in assessing whether the employee has met stated goals. [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 11:43 am
Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit in Mjahad v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 4:58 am
Some “systematic bias. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 7:24 pm
The final guidance contains a new addition that states that if there is an appropriate justification as to why a sponsor cannot submit patient-level data to FDA through traditional channels, third parties can provide these data through either a pre-IND or Type V Drug Master File (“DMF”) and provide the sponsor with a letter of authorization for FDA to reference the data. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 8:49 pm
See [United States v. [read post]
