Search for: "State v. Burden"
Results 3461 - 3480
of 22,138
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2007, 10:37 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 9:05 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 6:57 am
The first, United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 3:33 am
—Sheryl Sandberg 1Casey v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 7:42 am
STATE V. [read post]
13 May 2013, 6:48 pm
United Airlines v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 11:33 am
” United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 12:00 am
In Fries v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 2:30 am
Lovlace v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 9:05 am
[W]hether the plaintiffs have sustained their burden of proving that the defendant had breached the terms of the insurance policies assigned to the plaintiffs by refusing to pay the amounts stated in the plaintiffs' invoices. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 12:15 am
McDonald v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 3:15 am
Summary dismissal during a disciplinary probation periodWilliams v NYSOMH, 259 AD2d 623Disciplinary charges were filed against Henry Williams, an employee of the New York State Office of Mental Health, alleging that he was guilty of excessive absenteeism.The disciplinary action was settled when Williams agreed to serve a disciplinary probation period during which period he could be terminated “without recourse to Article 33 of the State-CSEA Agreement [a negotiated… [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:08 pm
In Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 6:28 pm
Although Employment Division v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 11:34 am
In Zeinali v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 10:56 pm
Michael v. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 8:14 am
Motion, 7:16-17, citing Christensen v. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 12:49 pm
Contrary to NYL's contention, however, "compliance with this minimum standard [does not] automatically relieve a manufacturer or importer of state common law liability" (Colon v BIC USA, Inc., 136 F Supp 2d 196, 208; see Liquore v Tri-Arc Mfg. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 2:51 pm
Carl Folsom won in State v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 1:05 pm
The Dormant Commerce Clause prevents state from instituting legislation that “discriminates against or excessively burdens interstate commerce. [read post]