Search for: "State v. C. R." Results 3461 - 3480 of 13,580
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (C) Secretary of State for Work & Pensions, heard 10-11 Jul 2017. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 4:42 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Am. v ABB Power Generation, 91 NY2d 180, 186 [1997]; see 2138747 Ontario, Inc. v Samsung C & T Corp., 144 AD3d 122 [1st Dept 2016]). [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Instead, Judge Kavanaugh read the Supreme Court’s Heller decision and its 2010 decision in McDonald v. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 11:19 am by Ron Coleman
” The Board routinely takes judicial notice of dictionary definitions when supplied with a copy of the definition, Univ. of Notre Dame du Lac v. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (C) Secretary of State for Work & Pensions, heard 10-11 Jul 2017. [read post]
14 Oct 2017, 6:49 pm by Mark Summerfield
’  In the 1997 case of Genentech, Inc. v Chiron Corp. 112 F.3d 495 the CAFC expressly stated that: ‘”Comprising” is a term of art used in claim language which means that the named elements are essential, but other elements may be added and still form a construct within the scope of the claim. [read post]
14 Oct 2017, 8:56 am by Bill Marler
An Introduction to Norovirus The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that noroviruses cause nearly 21 million cases of acute gastroenteritis annually, making noroviruses the leading cause of gastroenteritis in adults in the United States. [1] According to a relatively recent article in the New England Journal of Medicine: The Norwalk agent was the first virus that was identified as causing gastroenteritis in humans, but recognition of its importance as a pathogen has… [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
A person signing a DMCA notice must state a good faith belief that the use is not authorized, declare her authority to act under penalty of perjury, and risk damages for misrepresentation under section 512(f).[3] That source of protection has not technically disappeared, but its value is largely lost when notices are generated not by a person, but by a machine. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 5:41 pm by Kevin LaCroix
As I have detailed on this blog (most recently here), due to two Delaware court decisions — the Delaware Supreme Court’s 2015 decision in Corwin v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 5:41 pm by Kevin LaCroix
As I have detailed on this blog (most recently here), due to two Delaware court decisions — the Delaware Supreme Court’s 2015 decision in Corwin v. [read post]