Search for: "State v. Country"
Results 3461 - 3480
of 26,796
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 am
In contrast, EO-3 does not assert that any country subject to its restrictions affirmatively encouraged inadmissible foreign nationals to enter the United States. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 3:30 pm
I'm fairly confident that Judge Kleinfeld gets this one right, and that Jose Valeriano -- a 34-year old Mexican national with three United States citizen children -- isn't entitled to equitable tolling, and hence can and will (and, legally, should) be deported to Mexico. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 10:58 am
For a recent example, check out McNeil v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 12:04 pm
The Facts Behind Martel v. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 5:35 pm
The Hungarian tax authority argued that the aim of its regulation was to secure the economic well-being of the country, as well as to protect the rights of others (i.e., actual and potential business partners of the applicant). [read post]
30 May 2017, 3:35 am
At Constitution Daily, Lyle Denniston lays out the timeline and procedures by which the challenge to President Donald Trump’s executive order temporarily barring entry into the United States of foreign nationals from six majority-Muslim countries could make its way before the Supreme Court. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:23 pm
In a 5-4 opinion written by Justice Kennedy, the United States Supreme today held in United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2020, 9:20 am
Case citation: UMG Recordings v. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 12:18 pm
Prisoner returns between the United States and Russia are considered rare because the countries do not have an extradition treaty. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 2:49 am
That court has jurisdiction only to rule on the damage caused in the Member State within which the court is situated.While the jurisdictional side of the ruling has its upside, the notion that the court has jurisdiction only to rule on the damage caused in the Member State within which the court is situated is a pain if it potentially means separate litigation in each of 28 jurisdictions to recoup damages on a country-by-country basis, particularly if the… [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 4:14 am
Hill v Helsep – former Rep. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 10:00 pm
” Although the destination country in this case was the United States, the close and detailed regulation by the EU represented the claimants’ best hope. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 10:42 am
Today, the Supreme Court decided Mellouli v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 8:00 am
Contreras v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 4:51 am
Citing an earlier Supreme Court ATS case, Sosa v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 4:51 am
Citing an earlier Supreme Court ATS case, Sosa v. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court answered that question in the 1898 case of United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 12:00 am
The sections that were declared void were: Section 3: which states that it is a state crime for an individual to be in the US without proper authorisation; Section 5(C): which states that it is a state crime for unauthorised immigrants to apply for job or to work in Arizona; and Section 6: which allows state law enforcement officials to arrest without a warrant any individual who is otherwise lawfully in the country, if they have probable cause… [read post]
24 May 2011, 1:48 pm
Yesterday's Supreme Court opinion in Brown v. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 6:35 am
The most important Elder Law decisions from around the country are summarized here. [read post]
