Search for: "State v. Davis"
Results 3461 - 3480
of 6,204
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2017, 3:59 am
at 50 [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Dombrowski v Bulson, 19 NY3d 347, 350; AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 434). [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 11:24 am
The majority held that the request was clear under Miranda and the state court's reasoning that it was ambiguous under Davis was unreasonable. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 12:40 pm
Finally, in the case of Davis v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 7:49 am
United States and Tolentino v. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 10:42 am
MemberWorks, Inc. (2005) 273 Conn. 634, 641 [872 A.2d 423]; Davis v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 8:39 am
See United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 10:02 am
Alexander Aleinikoff (Georgetown), Hiram Chodosh (Utah), Nora V. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 8:41 am
District Court for the Northern District of California, Davis et al. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 11:20 am
Don't worry: today remains V-Day and not Z-Day. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 8:13 am
District Judge James V. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 6:48 am
Randy Smith, and Stephen Reinhardt -- the last of the 3 having denied the motion to disqualify himself filed by proponents of the ban, contained in the state's Constitution as a result of voters' approval of a 2008 ballot initiative, Proposition 8 (prior IntLawGrrls posts available here).The Ninth Circuit has decided to permit live dissemination of the arguments in the case, Perry v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 12:30 pm
This Essay expands the analysis in light of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Davis v. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 9:49 am
This is McCleskey v. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 4:21 pm
” On 8 to 10 November 2021, Saini J heard the trial in the harassment and libel case of Davies v Carter, judgment was reserved and will be handed down on 15 November 2021. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 3:59 am
This morning the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Merit Management Group v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 3:57 am
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger writes that United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
But query whether in the federalism context, where other plain-statement rules such as that announced in 1991 in Gregory v Ashcroft (which requires Congress to clearly say in the text of a regulatory statute that the statute applies to state and local government entities before states can be required to obey) seem designed to make sure Congress has carefully considered state interests, Congress itself has to be the one to fix any vagueness problems in the terms of… [read post]
26 May 2010, 10:22 am
Davis and Bryan A. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 9:01 pm
For example, in the famous and controversial case of Rust v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 3:10 pm
Davis, 128 Md. [read post]
