Search for: "State v. Frame"
Results 3461 - 3480
of 6,711
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2020, 12:18 pm
In Skyrise Construction Group, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 3:52 pm
Rather, the letter is designed to frame the discussion, to offer accurate information to inform the public, and to enable policy makers to make well‐informed choices. [read post]
17 Jul 2021, 6:30 am
While the “Deep State” is a phantom which plays on fears of power that cannot be called to account, “depth” is a real and valuable attribute of this state, one which underwrites continuity, consistency, competence, and collaboration. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 5:30 am
Attorney General declined to appeal Wrenn v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 10:04 am
But in some relatively recent decisions, principally Ayotte v. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 9:08 am
In Dred Scott v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 7:30 am
Yet in Griswold v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 10:12 am
State of Kerala [(1981) 4 SCC 391], State of Rajasthan v. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 8:13 am
Maynard); (3) harm to others is a limit on free exercise (Reynolds; United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 3:02 am
See CSC Holdings LLC v. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
Citing Deas v Levitt, 73 NY2d 525 and other decisions, the Appellate Division opined although "no individual had a vested right to be appointed to a vacant position — not even those whose scores placed them in the top three examinees", in this instance once individuals were appointed, they may have become entitled to damages or other relief based on Employer's alleged contractual breach, i.e., failure to make such appointments within the time frame… [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 12:00 am
Citing Deas v Levitt, 73 NY2d 525 and other decisions, the Appellate Division opined although "no individual had a vested right to be appointed to a vacant position — not even those whose scores placed them in the top three examinees", in this instance once individuals were appointed, they may have become entitled to damages or other relief based on Employer's alleged contractual breach, i.e., failure to make such appointments within the time frame… [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 5:20 am
Jones v. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 1:06 am
The case of Nova Productions Ltd v Mazooma Games Ltd further adds to this, where the court deemed that the authorship of the copyright protected works would be afforded to the human programmer as they "…devised the appearance of the various elements of the [video] game and the rules and logic by which each frame is generated and he wrote the relevant computer program". [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 3:48 am
KGAA v. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Polansky v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 6:12 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court issued a 5-4 decision in Barton v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
The plaintiffs emphasize the long history of Virginia mandating disclosure of race as a means of enforcing the state’s anti-miscegenation laws prior to the Supreme Court’s 1967 decision in Loving v. [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 10:35 am
In United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2021, 3:18 pm
In Taking Offense v. [read post]