Search for: "State v. Heard" Results 3461 - 3480 of 17,246
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2011, 2:03 pm by Steve Hall
State is available in Adobe .pdf format. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 8:00 am by Don Cruse
The Court did announce an argument date for STATE OFFICE OF RISK MANAGEMENT v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 7:39 am by CMS
The decision, in favour of the manufacturers, was handed down approximately two months after the case was heard by the Supreme Court. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:49 pm by Alex Hunt
The state Supreme Court upheld the sentence, concluding that the Supreme Court’s more recent decision in Graham v. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 5:21 pm by Stuart Kaplow
And the 38 page decision in Board of County Commissioners of Washington County v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 3:35 am by Douglas Berman
It has now been more than a year since Justice Antonin Scalia passed away, but his jurisprudential spirit seemed to fill the courtroom yesterday as the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Dean v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 11:42 am by Tana Fye
 Likewise, it makes sense for the County Attorney to have some control over the actions of the state agency prior to the case being heard before the judge. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 2:25 am
Six of the seven state Illinois Supreme Court judges heard the case that centers on a 3-year-old girl who is severely disabled. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 Royal Mencap Society v Tomlinson-Blake, heard 12- 13 February 2020 Shannon v Rampersad & Anor (T/A Clifton House Residential Home), heard 12-13 February 2020 Asda Stores… [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 1:52 pm by David Ettinger
The cases (and the issues presented, as stated on the court’s website) that will be argued on November 8 and 9 are: Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 11:44 am by Wells Bennett
Just so y’all know: the military commission expects a more orderly affair this time around, in United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Almost every newspaper, local and national has carried hysterical and inaccurate pieces setting out doomsday scenarios if section 40 is enacted and consistently misdescribing the Leveson system of audited self-regulation as “state backed” (or even “state”) regulation. [read post]