Search for: "State v. Johnson" Results 3461 - 3480 of 8,068
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Aug 2015, 12:27 pm by CJLF Staff
Court Rules Illegal Immigrants Have 2nd Amendment Rights:  In the case of United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 8:38 am by Clare Freeman, RWS, WD Mich
Johnson, 553 F.3d 990 (6th Cir. 2009), and United States v. [read post]
THE
2 Dec 2009, 3:35 pm by CAPTAIN
A high court majority rejected Johnson's application for a stay of execution and his petition for review in which he raised the Eighth Amendment challenge.Justice John Paul Stevens, joined by Justice Stephen Breyer, dissented, saying Johnson’s situation was “as compelling a case” as he had encountered raising the constitutional concerns that Stevens himself raised in a 1995 dissent from another denial of certiorari: Lackey v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 12:00 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Reverdy Johnson represented the appellants (Waring et al.) in Waring v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 2:34 pm
 DePuy argued that plaintiffs’ state law design defect claims were preempted under Pliva v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 10:13 am by Bexis
Johnson & Johnson, Inc., 41 A.3d 823 (Pa. 2012), decision. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 5:01 am by Russell Wheeler
Wisconsin Elections Commission, Dec. 4, 2020) and a request to block the certification of the state vote (Mueller v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Judicial review of the discharge of a probationary employee is limited to whether the determination was made in bad faith or for an improper or impermissible reason" (Matter of Petkewicz v Allers, 137 AD3d 1045, 1046 [2016] [citations omitted]; see Matter of Johnson v City of New York, 34 AD3d 484, 485 [2006]). [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Judicial review of the discharge of a probationary employee is limited to whether the determination was made in bad faith or for an improper or impermissible reason" (Matter of Petkewicz v Allers, 137 AD3d 1045, 1046 [2016] [citations omitted]; see Matter of Johnson v City of New York, 34 AD3d 484, 485 [2006]). [read post]