Search for: "State v. Maker" Results 3461 - 3480 of 4,684
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2017, 11:48 am by Dan Flynn
“ABC has reached an amicable resolution of its dispute with the makers of ‘lean finely textured beef. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:18 am by Phyllis H. Marcus
“Consequently, the theory underlying plaintiffs’ state law claims depends entirely on an FDA regulation,” the court wrote. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:18 am by Phyllis H. Marcus and Matthew W. Modell
“Consequently, the theory underlying plaintiffs’ state law claims depends entirely on an FDA regulation,” the court wrote. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 5:33 pm by John Tomaszewski
In essence, the definition of “personal information” and the “harm” v. [read post]
4 Sep 2017, 6:57 am by Cannabis Law Group
Many cannabis companies are closely watching the outcome of Gorilla Glue Co. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 5:26 pm by Katharine Van Tassel
There is a basic difference between direct state interference with a protected activity and state encouragement of an alternative activity consonant with legislative policy.This body of jurisprudence opens the door for programs like the one being pilot tested in West Virginia that I blogged on last week over at the Health Law Prof Blog. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 1:24 pm by Ron Coleman
” That right, at least as Louis Vuitton wants to wield the statute, is in fatal tension with the First Amendment, according to the amicus brief, which cites the 2nd Circuit’s 2012 expansion of free speech rights in U.S. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 10:48 am
And while the attached judgment in the Florida case [State of Florida v Federated Institute for Patent and Trademark Registry (FIPTR), see also petition for certiorari here] does not count as true research, it is my contention that it gives a snapshot of the kind of impact that such invitations can have and are having. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 1:53 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Criminal defendants in New York enjoy co-existing state and federal constitutional rights to confront their accusers. [read post]