Search for: "State v. Means"
Results 3461 - 3480
of 61,264
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2017, 3:00 am
” After CAFA, Miller County lawyers needed a means of keeping their lucrative class action lawsuits before the state court judges, and the stipulation at issue in Knowles provided precisely such a means. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 1:26 pm
The Monomeles Protodikeio: an insider's viewLast December the IPKat reported on Case C-535/13 Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha v Maria Patmanidi SA, a request by a Greek court, the Monomeles Protodikeio Athinon, for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 11:53 am
Cir. 2000) stating that "when in a claimed 'means' limitation the disclosed physical structure is of little or [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 10:44 am
States are slashing funding for family planning. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 10:51 am
" I agree that this means Conti is not merely requesting an advisory opinion. [read post]
10 Jun 2005, 5:37 am
In a Booker remand in United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2016, 10:20 am
Supreme Court in Utah v. [read post]
2 Jul 2016, 10:20 am
Supreme Court in Utah v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 3:31 pm
Kern County Water Agency v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 7:41 am
In Sohm v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 12:00 am
In SEC v. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 12:16 pm
Here's a snippet:"In United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 3:15 pm
United States). [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 12:10 pm
So if you think (as the voters do here) that it should be a violation of the Constitution for a state to only allow registered members of a party to vote in that party's primary, then by all means, feel free to make that argument.But the Supreme Court held back in 1990 that it was unconstitutional for states (like California) to require an open primary when that's not what the party wants. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V A fugitive criminal shall not be surrendered under the provisions hereof, when, from lapse of time or other lawful cause, according to the laws of the country within the jurisdiction of which the crime was committed, the criminal is exempt from prosecution or punishment for the offense for which the surrender is asked. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 10:47 pm
United States, United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 10:00 am
Just because witnesses are supposedly "unavailable" means a criminal case should be adjourned as a matter of course? [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 9:31 am
In the Los Angeles case of Joesph Butenhoff v. [read post]
7 Jul 2024, 8:31 am
This means the state must show that the law serves a compelling government interest and is narrowly tailored to achieve that interest. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 4:37 pm
FLFMC, LLC v. [read post]
