Search for: "State v. T. L. D."
Results 3461 - 3480
of 4,189
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2010, 6:05 am
L. 100-690, Title VII, §§ 7057, 7080, 102 Stat. 4402, 4406.) [read post]
7 May 2010, 12:50 am
ZR 27/07 (EPLAW) Appeals Court: Düsseldorf: RapidShare doesn't need to filter user uploads (Ars Technica) (TorrentFreak) India Tales from decrypt dept – guest post on s 65A Copyright Amendment Bill (Spicy IP) Netherlands BREIN wants Usenet provider to start filtering (TorrentFreak) File-sharers are content industry’s ‘largest customers’ (Ars Technica) United Kingdom Gmail settlement reached (Class 46) United… [read post]
6 May 2010, 6:35 pm
Hansen Beverage Co. v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 7:39 am
Thibault, L. [read post]
4 May 2010, 5:48 pm
L. 277 (1998). [read post]
3 May 2010, 1:25 pm
See Haynes Int'l, Inc. v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 10:36 am
L. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:34 am
L. 105–277, div. [read post]
3 May 2010, 3:01 am
Newline Cinema (Copyright Litigation Blog) 2nd Circuit vacates Catcher in the Rye injunction – applies eBay: Salinger v Colting (Copyright Litigation Blog) 2nd Circuit dismisses claims by Ms Lapine that Jessica Seinfeld’s ‘Deceptively Delicious’ was a rip off of her recipe book (The IP Factor) District Court S D New York: Copyright transfer termination notices subject California copyright heirs to jurisdiction in New York: Marvel Worldwide, Inc. v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 2:28 am
LFC Corporate Services, Inc., Opposition No. 91181109 [Section 2(d) opposition to LFC, LFC.COM, and LFC ONLINE for various real estate services, in view of several LF marks for real estate services].May 25, 2010 - 2 PM: In re DG Fastchannel, Inc. , Serial No. 77136602 [Section 2(d) refusal of HD NOW for "Broadcasting services, namely, transmission of video advertising media and metadata via proprietary media management systems" [HD disclaimed], in view of the stylized… [read post]
2 May 2010, 7:58 am
We don’t have to vote for the old guys v. the new guys. [read post]
1 May 2010, 6:14 am
Nat’l Trust & Sav. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 4:22 pm
Eastland Homes Partnership Limited v Sandra Whyte 2010 EWHC 695 (QB) Following Weaver v L&Q and McIntyre v Gentoo, here is a clear indication of the brave new world of public law in which RSLs (sorry, PRHPs) find themselves. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 4:22 pm
Eastland Homes Partnership Limited v Sandra Whyte 2010 EWHC 695 (QB) Following Weaver v L&Q and McIntyre v Gentoo, here is a clear indication of the brave new world of public law in which RSLs (sorry, PRHPs) find themselves. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 12:15 pm
Darbyshire also referenced a 2006 California Court of Appeal decision (O'Grady v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 12:24 am
The first half of this sentence doesn’t make sense. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 6:00 am
Jump to County: A-B C D-G H-K L-M O-S T-W Jump to City: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
FERC, 520 F.3d 464 (2008), rev’d sub nom. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 5:12 am
Reno, supra, said in a footnote: [T]he [American Civil Liberties Union v. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 5:01 am
We wouldn’t get involved in the science, ex post v. ex ante and that sort of thing. [read post]
