Search for: "State v. Williams " Results 3461 - 3480 of 8,282
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2016, 7:23 am by Rick St. Hilaire
 - William ShakespeareThe Bard's poetic coined phrase features prominently in the prosecution's latest pleading filed in the case of U.S. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 2:22 pm by Kevin
Tip: even if there might be a valid point somewhere in the decision (and I’m not saying there is), you should consider whether another case (or six) making that point might be available before citing Dred Scott v. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 9:00 am by Michael Gibbs
  Yet the opening pages of Oleg V. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 11:30 am by Rick Houghton
  Articles IV and V oblige the U.S government and Soviet Union to destroy the missiles’ “launchers[,] support structures and support equipment . . . associated with such missiles and launchers. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 11:15 am by Orin Kerr
Hall Jr., The Ninth Circuit’s Deficient Examination of the Legislative History of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act in United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 9:14 am by David Post
It instructs fact-finders, as the Court put it in Taylor v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 8:54 am by Kelly Buchanan
” In August 2016, it was announced that a national day to commemorate the wars would be observed from 2017, with the date later set as October 28 – the date of the signing of the Declaration of Independence. 1847: In R v Symonds, the Supreme Court recognized the doctrine of aboriginal title as part of New Zealand law and upheld the government’s preemptive right to purchase Māori land. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 3:51 pm by John Floyd
Supreme Court Chief Justice, William Rehnquist in the 1987 decision, United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 1:43 am by Tom Pritchard
  Counsel presented case law that the ordinary meaning of the words and legislative history supported a broad interpretation of the phrase (Hobbs v Winchester Corpn [1910] 2 KB 471, Place v Rawtenstall Corpn (1916) 86 LJKB 90, Clayton v Sale Urban District Council [1926] 1 KB 415 and Neath Rural District Council v Williams [1951] 1 KB 115). [read post]