Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection" Results 3461 - 3480 of 4,765
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2014, 8:50 am by John Elwood
”  Another first-time relist is T-Mobile South, LLC v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 6:14 pm by Stephen Page
  Sometimes when parties break up, their entities not surprisingly hit a rough patch – because the focus of the parties on business is less than it ever was before. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 6:36 am by Breakstone, White & Gluck
This is the largest fine ever levied for a Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act violation, according to Consumer Reports. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
A data protection NGO is calling on the European Commission to block Google’s planned acquisition of Fitbit, arguing the technology giant doesn’t have a “clean record” with the handling of sensitive personal information. [read post]
29 Sep 2007, 1:19 am
A paper from another panel:Eric Claeys, George Mason University School of LawINS v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 1:16 am by Fernando M. Pinguelo
  Security is important to keep unwanted snoops out of the information, ensure that it hasn’t been mixed up with other information (maybe from other networks…because this might wave privilege), and to ensure that it hasn’t been lost or destroyed. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 5:01 am by Terry Hart
The opposition to these recent legal developments is rooted in a belief that stronger intellectual property protections result in higher tolls, which, in turn, price many consumers out of accessing and using the information. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 7:27 am
About $465 (but remember, much higher consumable costs, likely around 25 cents per page v. about 2 cents per page for the black and white unit above). [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
United States Texas State Representative, Giovanni Capriglione, introduced a privacy bill to the state legislature which closely follows the Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act. [read post]
26 May 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
R v Cockell: Every now and again you read decisions… http://t.co/1rO9TX3TR4 -> Tim Cook tells Congress why Apple won’t move $100 billion back home http://t.co/aExyKemUDV -> Cuomo plays fashion police with Khloe Kardashian, warns of copyright violation on T-shirt http://t.co/FvRX43riPd -> IP Osgoode » A Cautionary Kudos: Canada Moves Up on USTR IP Watch List http://t.co/OjJuF1LCSQ -> Intellectual Property Law in Canada »… [read post]
22 May 2012, 3:19 pm by Douglas Reiser
The law seeks to protect the insured, the consumer of the insurance policy, and level the playing field. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am by Joel R. Brandes
The ICWA and the federal regulations explicitly state that Awhere applicable State or other Federal law provides a higher standard of protection to the rights of the parent or Indian custodian than the protection accorded under the Act, ICWA requires the State or Federal court to apply the higher State or Federal standard@ (25 CFR 23.106; see 25 USC ' 1921). [read post]
12 May 2019, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
The LSE Media Policy Project blog has piece by Holly Powell-Jones entitled Online abuse: teenagers might not report it because they often don’t see it as a problem The TGI de Paris ruled on 9 A;pril 2019 that Facebook’s T&Cs on user-generated copyright content were unclear and confusing and were were unfair under the consumer code. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Consumer Financial Protection Bur [read post]