Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection"
Results 3461 - 3480
of 4,765
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2012, 8:10 pm
The post Ridiculous Trademark Opposition of the Week – Norwood Promotional Products v. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 7:55 am
It was more likely that consumers were purchasing the paintings because of their allegiance to the team, not because the paintings were thought to be originated or affiliated with the University of Alabama (dare the AmeriKat cite Arsenal v Reed's "badge of allegiance" argument?) [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 2:41 pm
See, Notte v. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 6:38 pm
(Information Week)Personal use of GPS trackers growing fast Read more here (The News Tribune)Why privacy policies don't work - and what might Read more (San Francisco Chronicle)Legislating Privacy After US v Jones (Communia)The Upside And Downside Of Privacy On The Web (New Tech Post)What EU Data Privacy Proposal Means For Business (Information Week)[DISCUSSION DRAFT] 112TH CONGRESS To require disclosures to consumers regarding the… [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 11:55 am
Thus, Northern Star showed literal falsity and didn’t need to show evidence of consumer confusion. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 11:53 am
Anziska had this to say about the latest bunch of lawsuits: Now that fifty-one additional recent law school graduates, represented by some of the most accomplished consumer protection lawyers in the country, have sued their law schools, it is time for the schools to take responsibility, provide compensation, and commit to transparency. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 11:05 am
Don’t put your life in the hands of just any attorney. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 10:07 am
Among other claims, she asserted claims under the TCPA, the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act, and Washington’s Consumer Protection Statute. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 1:18 pm
While the First Amendment aggressively protects one's right to express personal opinions from government suppression, a government, such as the City of Indianapolis, can readily limit commercial speech that is deceptive and misleading.* * * Eric Williams v. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 11:00 pm
In the not-so-distant past (before 2008’s “Egyptian Goddess” decision) (Egyptian Goddess, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 12:59 pm
Don't just give up, if the RFE or a denial is issued. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 6:23 am
In the notorious PLIVA v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 12:50 pm
When I first reported on the "bombshell" ruling of the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) in GPX Int'l Tire Corp. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 9:45 am
A sketchy business model + a litigation shop that isn't very good at litigation = one dead start-up. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 1:30 am
Top stories today via @mcafeedlp @lgtweetsip @netbackup @nicbaker @10comm # Mexico's Data Protection Law Fully in Force – The implementing regulations of Mexico's Federal Law for the Protectio… http://t.co/4NuBaAab # Supreme Court Decision in Warrantless GPS Tracking Case Offers Little Guidance in Consumer Privacy Context http://t.co/OS5vh06x # Tablet and E-book reader Ownership Nearly Double Over the Holiday Gift-Giving Period http://t.co/TqBCwnk4 # Justices… [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 2:21 pm
So in lieu of a calm considered post (or even in lieu of a lengthy and time consuming but ill considered ranty post) please accept the following offerings: Contempt: Don’t be in it to win it. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 2:43 pm
Probs. 279-295 (2011).CORPORATIONS.Bodie, Matthew T. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 8:04 am
The Ninth Circuit’s withdrawn opinion is Fleischer Studios, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:00 pm
Past week: US v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:53 pm
The line-up of justices was therefore essentially the same as the 7-2 opinion in Eldred v. [read post]
