Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Laws" Results 3461 - 3480 of 55,045
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2023, 11:09 am by Mills & Mills LLP
In other words, Courts must strike a balance between what the law provides, and what choices people should be allowed to make for their own lives. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 7:37 am by Julia Lucivero
Ramirez and Jones will have a devastating impact on thousands of innocent people. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  This was especially true for his “language about the theoretical right of the sovereign people to interpose in the last resort,” Professor Fritz specifies. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 5:07 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
People v Weber 2023 NY Slip Op 03301 Decided on June 15, 2023 Court of Appeals Halligan, J. is an early (if not the first) decision written by the newly appointed Judge Halligan. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
It did not compass the nullifying of federal law, nor did it rely on a natural-law right of revolution. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 12:16 am by David Pocklington
He cited Lord Fraser in R v Inland Revenue Commissioners ex p. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm by Bryn Hines
” Nonetheless, Melling predicts that the Court will rule that people may be exempted from antidiscrimination laws that conflict with their religious beliefs. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 7:59 pm by Kurt R. Karst
Jeff Shuren During a presentation at the May 17, 2023 Food and Drug Law Institute (FDLI) Annual Conference, CDRH Director, Dr. [read post]