Search for: "US v. Givens"
Results 3461 - 3480
of 51,293
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2013, 3:45 pm
Therefore, any deficiencies in the chain of custody went only to the weight to be given to the evidence, not its admissibility as was also held in People v Hawkins. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 10:01 pm
Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 5:22 am
Hozelock argued that the prior use by the inventor was a public disclosure, given that the inventor's activities could potentially have been seen from the public road.I see you...Legal Background - When is prior use state of the art? [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 2:33 pm
Circuit has spoken in Obama v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 3:01 am
The Court of Appeal today handed down judgment in the case of JIH v News Group Newspapers Ltd ([2011] EWCA Civ 42). [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 6:48 am
[Note: this post is a work in progress, and will be updated as I digest the decision.]This morning, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in R v Spencer, 2014 SCC 43.The case, on appeal from the Supreme Court of Canada, has finally provided some certainty regarding the expectation of privacy that all Canadians enjoy in their online activities. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 11:34 am
It observed that Federal courts have a "virtually unflagging obligation ... to exercise the jurisdiction given them." 31 Foster Children v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 10:09 am
See Karsten v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 11:34 am
Yang v. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 12:11 pm
SEARCH & SEIZUREUnited States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 11:07 am
The Mississippi Court of Appeals issued a decision yesterday, Lowe v. [read post]
30 May 2013, 3:23 am
The Sixth Circuit used the case, U.S. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 8:51 am
Given the myriad and repeated instances of misconduct, the court cannot write these issues off as non-willful, inadvertent mistakes. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 7:56 am
Facebook, 2019 US Dist LEXIS 104488 (N.D. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 12:59 pm
That defense is not properly before us now, however, given that Clarke’s motion to dismiss was based solely on tribal sovereign immunity. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 2:51 am
Lastly, the use of the print out was not in violation of Shepard.U.S. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 10:19 am
On December 6, 1999, a consortium of 18 different record labels filed their lawsuit against Napster in a case that is goes by the name A&M Music v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 1:35 pm
Simpson Strong-Tie Co. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 11:47 am
In fact, under the so called Spearin Doctrine, which gets its name from a 1918 Supreme Court decision United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 8:46 am
Case Name: King v. [read post]
