Search for: "US v. Levelle Grant" Results 3461 - 3480 of 9,104
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2017, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
The Supreme Court may, however, take a different view in the event that permission to appeal, which has been applied for, is granted. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 5:45 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
The State appealed to the Appellate Division and the Supreme Court granted direct certification.HELD:    The harassment statute, N.J.S.A. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 6:46 am by Joy Waltemath
Even if he had engaged in a protected activity, his breach of the employer’s computer access policy provided a legitimate reason for termination and he failed to show that this reason was pretextual, the district court held, granting summary judgment in the employer’s favor (Knight v. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 6:31 am by Joy Waltemath
The court granted the employer’s motion for summary judgment against the employee’s claims that his termination constituted FMLA interference and retaliation (Carle v. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
In a lengthy, thoughtful August 29, 2017 opinion in S.M. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
In a lengthy, thoughtful August 29, 2017 opinion in S.M. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 4:18 pm by John Ellis
The case in which Judge Mazzant invalidated the Department of Labor’s new minimum salary Rule is State of Nevada, et al. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 1:24 pm by umbrella
Call us at (416) 736-0200 or 1-844-736-0200 or contact us online for an initial consultation. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 1:24 pm by umbrella
Call us at (416) 736-0200 or 1-844-736-0200 or contact us online for an initial consultation. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 12:23 pm by Mark Tabakman
Department of Labor used a salary level test that was excessive in determining whether workers should be exempt from overtime. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 7:47 am by Joy Waltemath
Nor did he show he was deprived of any required due process, said the court, affirming summary judgment against these claims as well as his defamation and breach of contract claims (Grant v. [read post]