Search for: "United States v. Jones" Results 3461 - 3480 of 3,760
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2008, 8:39 pm
Co., Inc., No. 84, 85 "When a contractor has promised to pay its workers the prevailing wages required by the United States Housing Act, the workers may sue under state law to enforce the promise" ETHICS & DISCIPLINARY CODE, ETHICS & PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY, PER CURIAM, SANCTIONS In the Matter of Honorable Robert M. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 3:43 pm
The settlement resolves a class action lawsuit, Hutchinson v. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 3:37 pm
The settlement resolves a class action lawsuit, Hutchinson v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 8:57 am
United States (1983), and Young v. [read post]
28 May 2008, 12:46 pm
As noted in an article by Floyd Norris of the New York Times, a panel of the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously ruled in Jones v. [read post]
23 May 2008, 7:12 pm by Claire
To do so, he had to wade through a thicket of court of appeals' opinions, ultimately siding with a 1977 opinion, United States v. [read post]
20 May 2008, 12:37 pm
Jones, which requires that a defendant direct conduct at a state, intending to cause effects in that state, where some (if not the brunt of) harm will be felt in that state. [read post]
5 May 2008, 4:52 pm by administrator
[xiii]  The federal civil rights statute is Section 1983 within Title 42 of the United States Code. [read post]
2 May 2008, 11:51 am
Jones is the fifth innocent death row inmate to be exonerated and freed in just the past 11 months in the United States. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 11:42 am
Clearly there is magic in the name, and Fame Jeans tried to capture that magic by registering Jack & Jones as a trademark in the United States. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 7:13 am
Moore, No. 06-1082 In a case raising the issue of whether a police officer violates the Fourth Amendment by making an arrest based on probable cause but prohibited by state law, the Supreme Court rules that warrantless arrests for crimes committed in the presence of an arresting officer are reasonable under the Constitution, and that while states are free to regulate such arrests however they desire, state restrictions do not alter the Fourth Amendment's protections. … [read post]