Search for: "United States v. Herring" Results 3461 - 3480 of 23,686
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2013, 6:31 am
For the following reasons, we agree with the respondent, and thus affirm the judgment of the habeas court because the petitioner’s challenge to the search of her work computer cannot establish her claim of actual innocence as a matter of law.")AC33937 - Coward v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 10:45 am
Sullivan, 446 U.S. 335 (1980); and a third based on United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The filing of her federal action, however, did not toll the running of the controlling statute of limitations with respect to the litigation of Defendant's state law issues. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The filing of her federal action, however, did not toll the running of the controlling statute of limitations with respect to the litigation of Defendant's state law issues. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 2:21 pm by Shea Denning
Third, the United States Supreme Court winds up its term, invariably deciding significant criminal law cases the very week of the conference. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 10:21 am
It is not often that the United States Supreme Court hears a family law case, so the Court's June, 2011, ruling in Turner v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 7:11 am by Anna Christensen
Florida and United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 10:13 am by Marylee Abrams
In a unanimous decision this week, the United States Supreme Court recognized a “ministerial exception” to federal discrimination laws. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 7:26 am
On Monday, the Eleventh Circuit rendered an interesting opinion in the case of King v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 6:03 am by Mark S. Humphreys
  Plaintiff, Michael Ihekoronye, filed the case in State court and United removed the case to Federal court. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 9:31 pm by Josh Blackman
["This outcome is clearly dictated by this Court’s decision in South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
4 Jan 2020, 9:59 am by Eugene Volokh
["It would be a violation of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution for the Court to order the Wife to participate in a religious ritual when she did not agree to do so nor may the Court impose a financial penalty against her. [read post]
  On Tuesday I attended a hearing called by the US Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions to examine women’s freedoms, focusing on access to abortions across the United States two years after the overturning of Roe v. [read post]