Search for: "United States v. Small" Results 3461 - 3480 of 6,888
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2013, 9:00 am by Allison Christians
” represent a small deviation from past jurisprudence, which simply repeats verbatim the regulatory language before going on to discuss the longstanding doctrine starting with Biddle v. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 1:44 pm by Mark Ashton
Ed. 666, 676-77 (1872); see also Note, The Establishment Clause and Religion in Child Custody Disputes, 82 Mich.L.Rev. 1702, 1716 n. 49 (1984) (collecting other United States Supreme Court cases). [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 8:20 pm by Dennis Crouch
S. 633 (2010) (quoting, for its current relevance, statement in United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 6:16 am
The members of the First Section were united in their view about the breaches. [read post]
2 Mar 2013, 2:37 pm by Larry Catá Backer
  On the 2012 Roundtable, see, Paper Delivered at the 2012 Penn State Law and Semiotics Roundtable: The Corporation as Semiosis, “Citizens United,” the Signification of the Corporate Enterprise and the Development of Law Law at the End of the Day, March 3, 2012; on the 2011 Roundtable see Larry Catá Backer, The 2011 Kevelson Workshop on Law and Semiotics at Penn State--Outstanding Student Presentations,  Law at the End of the Day, April 11,… [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 1:43 pm by Debra A. McCurdy
” CMS has withdrawn a December 12, 2014 proposed rule to revise selected conditions of participation (CoPs) for providers, conditions for coverage for suppliers, and requirements for long-term care (LTC) facilities to conform with the Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 2:53 pm by Joanna Powis and Jonathan Lord
Whether all reasonable steps have been taken will be fact-specific and the hurdle is a high one; the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) stated in its Statutory Code of Practice that “an employer would be considered to have taken all reasonable steps if there were no further steps that they could have been expected to take…” The scope of the defence was recently considered by the employment tribunal (ET) in Fischer v London United Busways Ltd,… [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
While the former course is undoubtedly preferable, past events in the United States and beyond make it crystal clear that both are possible. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 5:59 pm by Steven Calabresi
We should not be imposing one-size fits all national rules on abortion, which is one of the many reasons why Dobbs v. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 2:17 am
See also Burson v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 6:38 am by MBettman
At issue in this case is whether the Supreme Court of Ohio should update and clarify its attorney fee jurisprudence by adopting the United States Supreme Court’s guidance in Perdue v. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 7:01 am by Florian Mueller
But in the United States, proseuction history is part of the intrinsic evidence considered in claim construction, i.e., it's part of the most important category of evidence. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 7:20 pm by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
In 2013, the Court struck down the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 7:51 am by SHG
See United States v. [read post]