Search for: "Welling v. Welling" Results 3461 - 3480 of 110,244
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2023, 8:37 am by Erica Canas
This patent covered 6 separate claims for the functional design of the chair, including the “integral hollow shell” seat and “single central column” support for the seat, as well as the attachment and bolt configurations that secured the seat to the column. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 6:14 am by Udit Mahalingam
The Court of Appeal’s judgment in R (CAAT) v Secretary of State for International Trade [2019] EWCA Civ 1020 provides useful insight into how well-established principles of “irrationality” apply in the international arms trade context, and the extent to which the latitude afforded to the executive in this policy area affects this process. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm by Aaron Moss
Well, the U.K. copyright actually did expire in 1987, but one year later, the British Parliament introduced a unique exception to the Copyright Designs and Patents Act of 1988 in favor of the Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 10:55 am by CodeX
Another example is Google’s $5 billion lawsuit for tracking users’ incognito sessions in Brown v Google LLC. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:41 am by CMS
In this post, Phil Woodfield and Elizabeth Lombardo of CMS comment on the Supreme Court’s decision in Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter [2023] UKSC 41, which was handed down on 15 November 2023. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:15 am by Kluwer Patent Blog
Thus, with its order of July 11, 2023, it allowed an appeal to proceed (see case C-93/23, EUIPO v Neoperl). [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:14 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
Thus, with its order of July 11, 2023, it allowed an appeal to proceed (see case C-93/23, EUIPO v Neoperl). [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 6:31 am by Bob Ambrogi
It also improves access to justice for society as lawyers can handle more cases, as well as remove some bias from the legal system through fact-first drafting. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 4:58 am by Peter Mahler
Last month, in Flor v Greenberg Farrow Architectural Inc., a three-judge panel of the New Jersey Appellate Division handed down an opinion with important lessons for business owners and practitioners in states that have adopted the Revised Uniform LLC Act, such as New Jersey, as well as in states that haven’t, such as New York. [read post]