Search for: "A P.2."
Results 3481 - 3500
of 27,058
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2020, 4:56 am
Option #3 I’ll get the other non-ops to join me and we’ll propose to P&A the well (Article VI.E.2/VI.F.2, depending on the JOA version). [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 7:45 am
[6] 145 Wn.2d 417, 38 P.3d 322 (2002) [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 4:30 am
See p.4. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 3:01 pm
Posdata 2. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 11:00 am
App. 1973)[2]Daly v. [read post]
31 May 2013, 7:24 am
The former provision prevents the registration of non-distinctive signs, which cannot fulfil the essential function of a trade mark; the latter ensures that 'descriptive signs relating to one or more characteristics of the goods or services in respect of which registration as a mark is sought may be freely used by all traders offering such goods or services' (see Case C‑173/04 P Deutsche SiSi-Werke v OHIM, and Case C‑191/01 P OHIM v Wrigley). [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 12:15 pm
(c)(2), (3).) [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 10:38 am
" (Id., p. 279.) [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 12:00 am
” Slip op. at p. 2. [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 12:39 am
Note that the Berne Convention speaks of writings, lectures, paintings or sculptures (Article 2(1)). [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:46 pm
La candidatura de Celis es posible porque en la elección 2 Celis no fue reelecto, sino electo (por primera vez) para un cargo distinto al que se postuló en la Elección 1.Elección 4: Pérez - Celis. [read post]
29 May 2013, 9:16 am
Riley, Jason P. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 5:41 am
A RequestI benefit from significant work in areas related to my study [2]. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 6:38 am
§ 2. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
Hamberger & Weiss LLP, Rochester (Joseph P. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
Hamberger & Weiss LLP, Rochester (Joseph P. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 10:25 am
Péter Mezei and Caterina Sganga advocate for extending the doctrine of exhaustion to the digital realm, highlighting strong policy arguments for this shift. [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 2:14 am
</p> </div> <h3 style="padding-top:0px;padding-bottom:0px;margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:35px; margin-block-start:1em; margin-block-end:1em;"> 2. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 1:39 pm
See 29 C.F.R 1910.119(d)(3)(ii) and (j)(4)(ii) and 40 C.F.R 68.65(d)(2) and 68.73(d)(2). [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 5:12 am
Payne, P. v. [read post]
